{"id":11061,"date":"2017-08-13T14:38:32","date_gmt":"2017-08-13T21:38:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/?page_id=11061"},"modified":"2017-09-04T12:44:26","modified_gmt":"2017-09-04T19:44:26","slug":"radar-guns","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/?page_id=11061","title":{"rendered":"Speed Radar \/ Doppler"},"content":{"rendered":"

Many baseball players and Umpires had brain tumours<\/a>. \u00a0Did they all use cell phones? or was it the Radar Guns measuring the speed of the ball?<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Fullerton Informer states : ” All professional Baseball players have it rough. There is no doubt about it. I have known at least one personally and all the way from his farm team days to the big time under the bright lights, it has been an incredibly trying time both physically and emotionally. Long hours away from home and family are just one of the hallmarks of baseball\u2019s \u00a0commitments. All baseball players use cellphones to fill the long hours hours away from home. So why are the \u00a0GBM\u2019s are on the rise in just the pitchers, and catchers . It is no coincidence that this is the area of the brain closest to which the cell phone is held. Baseball players (even retired) probably use their cell phones often as they are on the road often. So why don\u2019t we see the left or right fielders, coaches, or first basemen inordinately coming down with brain tumors on a similar basis?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\"Yankees<\/a><\/p>\n

A lot goes on behind the plate as that is where all the action is. There are a lot of eyes and ears 30 feet back in the stands. What most people don\u2019t realize is that part of the action behind the plate and elsewhere involves radar. The radar is aimed at the pitcher from behind home plate and at times, in center field aimed at the catchers to get the velocities off of the bat. It is used on almost every ball that is pitched and caught, whether it be at practice, spring training or during regular season, a radar gun is in operation aimed directly at the pitcher. The catcher is also smack dab in the middle of the radar beam. Gary Carter was no exception. He was in the radar gun\u2019s line of fire almost all of the time. For that matter, so are most catchers, pitchers and even umpires. So why then, do not all pitchers, catchers and umpires get brain tumors?<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s talk about radar.\u00a0Radar employs microwave technology to determine the velocity of the ball as it travels to home plate from the pitcher\u2019s mound. It emits a precisely focused, directional beam of electromagnetic radiation that travels right through the catcher, umpire and to the pitcher. Just how many radar guns were in use at each respective game is unclear to me at this point but it is being investigated.<\/p>\n

In the 1960\u2019s, The X band<\/strong> frequency was used extensively which covered the 8-12 GHz range<\/strong>. In the early 1970\u2019s this was changed to the K band at 18-26 GHZ<\/strong>. Eventually the frequencies on radar guns were shifted to Ka bands<\/strong>, thus creating a more powerful, and accurate reading in the 26-40 GHz range<\/strong>. I can still remember listening to Don Drysdale \u00a0broadcasting on KMPC on my transistor radio in the 1970\u2019s talking about them clocking Nolan Ryan\u2019s 100 mph fast balls. Radar has been around on the ball field for a long time.<\/p>\n

Today, the readily available inexpensive models current operate on a frequency similar to the microwave oven in your home, which is around 2.4 GHz. This is also the same frequency that your WiFi and WiFi enabled wireless devices, including some cordless and cellular phones operate on as well. It is well established that microwaves have been shown to make the blood brain barrier permeable to toxins and metals.<\/p>\n

I believe this unique combination of cause and effect is why Gary and these individuals fell victim to this tragedy and many others, although exposed to the toxins, were not exposed to the radar failed to develop tumors. Those exposed to the radar that were not exposed to the toxins failed to develop tumors as well. I believe that both are required for the brain tumors to form and this explains what we are observing.<\/p>\n

Below is an excerpt from\u00a0Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.\u00a0Director, Center for Family and Community Health\u00a0School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley\u00a0\u00a0that confirms what low intensity microwaves do to the\u00a0blood\u00a0brain\u00a0barrier:<\/p>\n

\u201cSince exposure to low intensity microwave radiation can open the\u00a0blood-brain\u00a0barrier, toxic chemical exposure may be more harmful to anyone who is exposed to wireless radiation. For example, see\u00a0http:\/\/bit.ly\/14HDUpZ<\/a>.]\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

https:\/\/thefullertoninformer.com\/the-untimely-death-of-gary-carter-and-what-we-can-learn-from-what-happened-to-the-kid\/<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

archived<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

Law \u00a034.7 GHZ \u00a0( Ka BAND )<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n
http:\/\/www.stalkerradar.com\/law.php<\/a><\/div>\n
https:\/\/www.stalkerradar.com\/pdf\/011-0093-00%20Stalker%AE%20Pro%20II%20owner%27s%20manual%20Rev%20C.pdf<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“The\u00a0S\u00a0PRO II\u00a0radar transmits at a frequency of\u00a034.7 GHz<\/strong>\u00a0(34,700,000,000 Hz) using a\u00a0Ka-Band Transmitter<\/strong>. The receiver is designed to read the Doppler frequency (the change in frequency) which is much lower and lies between 100 Hz and 83,000 Hz<\/strong>. There are very few devices other than another radar gun that could cause interference in a radar gun\u2019s transmission frequency range. However, there are a number of devices that could interfere with a radar gun in the receiver\u2019s frequency range.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Sports \u00a024.150 GHZ \u00a0&\u00a0\u00a024.125 GHZ \u00a0 ( K BAND )<\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n
http:\/\/www.stalkerradar.com\/sportsradar\/<\/a><\/div>\n
https:\/\/www.stalkerradar.com\/pdf\/sport_manual.pdf<\/a><\/div>\n
https:\/\/www.stalkerradar.com\/sportsradar\/documents\/011-0090-00_Sport_2_operator_manual.pdf<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“The S SPORT 2 radar transmits at a frequency of 24.125 GHz<\/strong> (24,125,000,000 Hz), using a K-Band<\/strong> Transmitter. The receiver is designed to read the Doppler frequency (the change in frequency) between 360 Hz and 11,000 Hz<\/strong>. There are very few devices other than another radar gun that could cause interference in a radar gun\u2019s transmission frequency range. However, there are a number of devices that could interfere with a radar gun in the receiver\u2019s frequency range. “<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

Cops\u2019 radar guns emit 36 GHz frequency radiation that causes testicular cancer \u2013 who knew?<\/h2>\n

Monday, January 09, 2017 \u00a0by:\u00a0S.D. Wells<\/a><\/p>\n

(Natural News<\/a>) Six police officers found out the hard way that hand-held radar guns, kept in their lap while not pointing them at cars, cause testicular cancer over time. A study revealed that six incident cases of testicular cancer developed between\u00a01979 and 1991<\/a>for officers who all routinely held their radar devices in close proximity to their testes\u2013thus proving their only \u201cshared risk\u201d factor for\u00a0health hazards<\/a>\u00a0warranting the condition. One Norfolk, Virginia traffic cop said he worked with radar for 12 years, but since he quit using the radar gun, his cancer is in remission.<\/p>\n

Irradiation of localized tissues increases risk for leukemia and brain or testicular cancer<\/h2>\n

Traffic radar guns emit\u00a0microwave radiation<\/a>\u00a0at frequencies between 10.5 GHz and 36 GHz, with enough intensity to enhance tumor growth by several different means. The radiation is capable of disrupting immune function and enhancing the absorption of carcinogenic substances into cells, so although the radar gun itself may not be directly causing cancer, the microwave radiation is indirectly modifying gene expression and increasing cell proliferation rates, according to\u00a0scientific research<\/a>, thus leading to increased risk of cancer. Police officers who rest their active radar guns against their chest, next to their head, or in their lap are irradiating localized tissues.<\/p>\n

\u201cRadar guns can affect the health if they are not used properly,\u201d says Johnny Mercer, a motorcycle cop who taught police radar for years, and who says that keeping the gun next to the body for long periods of time increases the risk of cancer, like smokers who get lung cancer after years of tugging back on cigarettes. Mercer also compared the radar gun\u2019s radiation emissions to that of\u00a0microwave ovens<\/a>, which have been revealed to adversely affect human blood, heart rate, and\u00a0heart rate variations<\/a>\u00a0when people stand within 3 feet of a running \u201cnuker.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hampton, Virginia police prefer to set their radar guns in a bracket attached to the dashboard and are no longer allowed to keep the gun across their lap due to its \u201cdevastating effects on health, according to the police Chief there. The Virginia State Police troopers mount their guns outside the car, and they too have been instructed by the Norfolk and Virginia Beach police officials to limit their contact with radiation-emitting radar guns.<\/p>\n

National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health warns of radar gun dangers<\/h2>\n

Officials at the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health are advising police departments to have regular check ups of their radar\u00a0guns for radiation leakage, and they have advised the cops to mount the units on the outside of patrol cars whenever they can. The guns have been declared unsafe by one radar manufacturing company based out of Kansas called Kustom Signals, Inc.<\/p>\n

Of course, the US government and the military downplayed the dangers of the radar guns saying that there was \u201cno problem,\u201d and academic groups said that research was \u201cincomplete\u201d but that the police should \u201cuse caution.\u201d That doesn\u2019t change the fact that\u00a0several police officers are being injured<\/a>\u00a0and some are dying who kept the guns in their laps for years. In fact, out of 340 officers, the six cases of\u00a0testicular cancer\u00a0<\/a>all came from officers who said they kept the guns near their family jewels.<\/p>\n

For all those concerned now about\u00a0microwave ovens<\/a>, in comparison to radar guns, typical kitchen \u201cnukers\u201d produce an average of 2.4 GHz, less than 1\/12th that of some radar guns, yet are still capable of causing immediate and drastic changes to the human heart from just three feet away, and with the door closed. According to\u00a0Dr. Magda Havas<\/a>\u00a0of Trent University, people exposed to radiation for just three minutes at 2.4-GHz can experience severe reactions in heart rate changes and altered heart rate variations, indicating an alarm response to stress, also called electrohypersensitivity (EHS) or rapid aging syndrome. This has been studied for decades, as opposed to the police radar guns that are just beginning to \u201csound the alarms\u201d about\u00a0cancer<\/a>\u00a0(pardon the pun).<\/p>\n

Maybe the police need to also get their doctors to check them for heart palpitations, clumping of red blood cells and fluctuations of the parasympathetic nervous system \u2013 typical symptoms of radiation exposure from microwave ovens, and not just the radar guns.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Sources:<\/strong><\/p>\n

NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov<\/a><\/p>\n

PhonesCauseBrainCancer.com<\/a><\/p>\n

Articles.Courant.com<\/a><\/p>\n

Articles.DailyPress.com<\/a><\/p>\n

NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

http:\/\/www.naturalnews.com\/2017-01-09-cops-radar-guns-emit-36-ghz-frequency-radiation-that-causes-testicular-cancer-who-knew.html<\/span><\/a><\/span>
\n\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022<\/p>\n

\n

HUMAN EXPOSURE TO RADIO-FREQUENCY
\nFIELDS FROM POLICE RADARS
\n<\/b>
\nAs Approved by the IEEE United States Activities Board
\nMay 1992<\/h2>\n

*******************************************************************************************************************<\/p>\n

We recognize public concern about the safety of exposure to\u00a0electromagnetic fields. Recent allegations in the media link\u00a0cancer with exposure to police radars, one of the lowest power\u00a0microwave systems in our modern society — typically between 10 and\u00a0100 milliwatts.<\/p>\n

Guidelines for safe limits of exposure to microwaves have been\u00a0published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
\n(IEEE C95.1, 1991) and the American National Standards Institute\u00a0(ANSI C95.1, 1982). These guidelines were developed to protect
\nhuman beings from harmful exposure to radio frequency\u00a0electromagnetic fields. Our Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR)
\nhas stated that prolonged exposure at or below the levels\u00a0recommended in ANSI C95.1-1982 is not hazardous to human health
\nbased on present knowledge (IEEE-USA COMAR, 1990).<\/p>\n

Measurements and analysis of microwave exposures near properly\u00a0operating police radar units have shown that even maximal exposure
\nlevels are well below these recommended safety limits. In\u00a0addition, human exposures near police radar are substantially below\u00a0the limits set by other national and international standards.\u00a0Therefore, it can be concluded that microwave exposures near police
\nradar are safe by existing standards and that there is no\u00a0scientific basis for the alleged link of police radar with cancer.<\/p>\n

This statement was developed by the Committee of Man and Radiation
\nof the United States Activities Board of The Institute of\u00a0Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), and represents\u00a0the considered judgment of a group of U.S. IEEE members with\u00a0expertise in the subject field. The IEEE United States Activities\u00a0Board promotes the career and technology policy interests of the\u00a0250,000 electrical, electronics, and computer engineers who are\u00a0U.S. members of the IEEE.<\/p>\n

BACKGROUND<\/p>\n

Police radar was first introduced in the late 1940s as an offshoot\u00a0of World War II radar technology. From time to time, there has\u00a0been controversy over the accuracy of police radar in speed limit\u00a0enforcement. Nevertheless, police radar has evolved into an\u00a0accepted means of traffic control, with more than 75,000 radar\u00a0units in use in the United States.<\/p>\n

The microwave properties of speed radars have been known for years. \u00a0In 1981, tests on 22 radar units showed that power densities were
\nless than 3 mW\/cm2 at the aperture and that exposure decreased with\u00a0separation from the radiating horn (Baird, 1981). Police radar
\noperates at X and K-band frequencies (i.e.,\u00a010-35 GHz<\/strong>), with a\u00a0continuous-wave signal (no modulation), and with output power in\u00a0the range of 10 to 100 milliwatts. The vast majority of police\u00a0radars operate between 10-25 milliwatts, although a small number of\u00a0100 milliwatt devices are still in service. By comparison, the\u00a0power output of a child’s walkie- talkie is 35 milliwatts, and
\ncellular hand-held radio-telephones operate at power levels of\u00a0hundreds of milliwatts. In today’s society, many products utilize
\nsimilar technology and similar frequencies: alarm systems,\u00a0automatic door openers, motion detectors, and various personal
\ncommunications networks and inter-computer network systems. \u00a0Thousands of products produce environmental radio-frequency fields\u00a0at similar or higher intensities and in a broad range of \u00a0frequencies (e.g., microwave ovens, mobile radios, electronic news\u00a0gathering systems, broadcasting, amateur radio, and other devices).<\/p>\n

Police radar is a low-power system when compared against today’s\u00a0inventory of existing radio-frequency systems. The total power, \u00a0even if concentrated at a point as in a coaxial connector, is\u00a0insufficient to produce pain or skin burn (Osepchuk, 1983). \u00a0Microwaves at police radar frequencies are absorbed almost wholly\u00a0in the skin, and the power densities near a police radar are well\u00a0below the threshold for thermal sensation at X-band (Handler,\u00a01968).<\/p>\n

Biological research with animals at these frequencies has shown\u00a0biological effects only at much higher powers (Rosenthal, et al,\u00a01976 and Hagan, et al, 1976). At least 1 watt of power is\u00a0necessary to produce a cataract in irradiated rabbits at X-band. \u00a0At\u00a035 GHz<\/strong>, no cataracts result for less than 600 milliwatt contact\u00a0application to the rabbit eye. Minimal corneal damage under\u00a0contact conditions occurs only for at least 50 milliwatts delivered\u00a0continuously for 0.5 hours to a small area in the eye.<\/p>\n

Concerns about health effects (e.g., alleged cataracts) from police\u00a0radar apparently first surfaced in 1987 in a letter distributed by
\nSilicron Technologies (Tunnell, 1987). This claim received no\u00a0scientific support and in time disappeared. In 1990, a police
\nofficer from Ohio, Gary Poynter, published a report (Poynter, 1990) \u00a0that alleged a link between police radar exposure and cancer. As
\na prime example of biological effects of microwave energy at X-band, Poynter selected the series of experiments on Tenebrio
\nmolitor reviewed by Heynick and Polson (1983). They, however, did\u00a0not interpret these experiments as contradictions to ANSI C95.1-
\n1982. Furthermore, some of the early work on Tenebrious molitor\u00a0suggested effects of low power levels, which later were found not\u00a0to exist (Olsen, 1981). The allegations of Poynter have been\u00a0expanded in a series of media events — particularly a series of
\narticles in Law Enforcement News (1990-1991).<\/p>\n

Recently, Fisher (1991) measured police radar units and confirmed\u00a0the results of Baird (1981). Fisher concluded that maximum
\nexposure during normal use of a hand-held radar device is less than\u00a00.05 mW\/cm2. The newer radars tend to be at lower power than older
\nones included in the 1981 tests. As a low power device, police\u00a0radar is exempt from the requirement of providing evidence of
\ncompliance with ANSI C95.1-1982. This exemption was recently\u00a0confirmed to our Committee on Man and Radiation by the Federal
\nCommunications Commission (Cleveland, 1991). Police radar has been
\nexamined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and no action
\nby the FDA relative to its responsibilities under the Electronic\u00a0Product Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968 was\u00a0deemed warranted (Anderson, 1991).<\/p>\n

THE FDA STATED THAT IT KNOWS OF\u00a0“NO CONVINCING EVIDENCE OF A RISK OF CANCER OR OTHER HAZARDS FROM
\nEXPOSURE TO THE LEVEL AND TYPE OF MICROWAVE RADIATION PRODUCED BY\u00a0POLICE RADAR UNITS.”<\/p>\n

As an extra precaution to “ensure that no\u00a0violations of existing standards can occur,” the FDA recently
\nsuggested that the radar antenna be kept at least six inches from\u00a0the body while transmitting. The FDA also stated that “emissions\u00a0from police radar units contain no ELF modulation and have not been\u00a0associated with the present ELF-cancer controversy.”<\/p>\n

There is no scientific basis for worry that exposure to police\u00a0radar may cause or promote cancer. Underlying our position is its
\nreliance on the validity of existing science-based safety\u00a0standards. Exposure to police radar satisfies the limits of not\u00a0only IEEE and ANSI standards but also other standards both in the\u00a0U.S. (NCRP, 1986) and elsewhere in the world (IRPA, 1988). We\u00a0believe that continuing research on biological effects is necessary\u00a0across the whole electromagnetic spectrum, in order to ensure an
\nup-to-date refinement and improvement of existing safety standards.<\/p>\n

REFERENCES<\/p>\n

1. Andersen, F. (1991), Letter to COMAR dated June 20, 1991. \u00a0DCRH, FDA, Rockville, MD.<\/p>\n

2. ANSI C95.1 (1982), American National Standard: Safety\u00a0Levels with Respect to Human Exposure Radio Frequency
\nElectromagnetic Fields, 300 kHz to 100 GHz, IEEE\u00a0Standards Dept., Piscataway, NJ.<\/p>\n

3. Baird (1981), Field Strength Measurements of Speed\u00a0Measuring Radar Units, NBSIR 81-2215, NBS, Washington,\u00a0DC.<\/p>\n

4. Cleveland, R. (1991), Letter to COMAR dated May 13, 1991. \u00a0FCC Office of Engineering and Technology, Washington, DC.<\/p>\n

5. Fisher, P.D. (1991), Microwave Exposure Levels\u00a0Encountered by Police Traffic Radar Operators, Technical\u00a0Report MSU-ENGR-91-007, Michigan State University, East\u00a0Lansing, MI.<\/p>\n

6. Hagan, et al, (1976) in Biological Effects of\u00a0Electromagnetic Waves, C.C. Johnson and M.L. Shore,
\neditors, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, pp.\u00a0143-153.<\/p>\n

7. Hendler, E. (1968), “Cutaneous Response to Microwave
\nIrradiation” in Thermal Problems in Aerospace Medicine,
\nJ.D. Hardy, editor. Surrey, Unwins Ltd.<\/p>\n

8. Heynick, L. and Polson, P. (1983), “Bioeffects of Radio
\nFrequency Radiation: A Review,” USAF School of Aerospace
\nMedicine, Brooks AFB, TX.<\/p>\n

9. IEEE C95.1 (1991), Safety Levels with Respect to Human\u00a0Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields,\u00a03 kHz\u00a0to 300 GHz<\/strong>, IEEE Standards Dept., Piscataway, NJ.<\/p>\n

10. IEEE-USA Entity Position Statement (1990) “Human Exposure\u00a0to Microwaves and Other Radio Frequency Electromagnetic
\nFields,” IEEE-USA COMAR, Washington, DC.<\/p>\n

11. IRPA (1988), “Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Radio\u00a0Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency Range\u00a0from 100 kHz to 300 GHz,” Health Physics, Vol. 54 (1) pp.\u00a0115-123.<\/p>\n

12. Law Enforcement News, (1990-1991), a series of articles
\nbeginning Nov. 15, 1990 to March 15, 1991 on “Police\u00a0Radar and Health Problem Allegations.”<\/p>\n

13. NCRP (1986), Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for\u00a0Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Report No. 86. \u00a0National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement,\u00a0Bethesda, MD.<\/p>\n

14. Olsen R. (1981), Microwave Induced Developmental Effects\u00a0in the Common Mealworm (Tenebrio Molitor) – A Decade of
\nResearch, NAMRL Report No. 1283, U.S. Navy, Pensacola,\u00a0FL.<\/p>\n

15. Osepchuk, J.M. (1983), “The Microwave Stimulus,” in\u00a0Microwaves and Thermoregulation, E.R. Adair, Editor,\u00a0Academic Press, NY, pp. 33-56.<\/p>\n

16. Poynter, G. (1990), Traffic Radar: Human Experimentation\u00a0Without Informed Consent available for $40.00 from\u00a0Priority-One Consultants, 4535 West Sahara Ave., Suite\u00a0105-126M, Las Vegas, NV 89102.<\/p>\n

17. Rosenthal, et al (1976) in Biological Effects of\u00a0Electromagnetic Waves, C.C. Johnson and M.L. Shore,
\neditors, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,\u00a0pp.110-125.<\/p>\n

18. Tunnell, J., (1987) Letter on Police Radar from Silicon\u00a0Technologies dated Jan. 7, 1987.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022\u2022<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n

    Cancer Incidence Among Police Officers in a US … – NCBI – NIH<\/a><\/h3>\n

    https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC4681507\/<\/p>\n

    16 Dec 2015 … The risk of overall cancer among police officers was found to be … Police officers are routinely exposed to radiation from radar guns (Lotz,\u00a0…<\/p>\n

     <\/li>\n

  2. \n

    Police Officers Tell Congress of Radar Gun Cancer Fears – latimes<\/a><\/h3>\n

    articles.latimes.com\/1992-08-11\/news\/mn-5561_1_traffi..<\/p>\n

    11 Aug 1992 … Police officers told Congress on Monday they fear the radar guns they use to catch speeders are giving them cancer, but scientists … of the sort emitted by radar guns “may carry a significant biological and biomedical risk,”\u00a0…<\/p>\n

     <\/li>\n

  3. \n

    Radar Guns May Beam Danger to Officers : Courts: Cancer cases …<\/a><\/h3>\n

    articles.latimes.com\/1992-01-13\/local\/me-174_1_traffi..<\/p>\n

    13 Jan 1992 … Radar Guns May Beam Danger to Officers : Courts: Cancer cases have … prompted some law enforcement agencies to revise procedures for\u00a0…<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \n
    1. \n

      Police Using Radar that Sees Through Walls – Schneier on Security<\/a><\/h3>\n

      https:\/\/www.schneier.com\/blog\/archives\/2015\/01\/police..<\/p>\n

      27 Jan 2015 … This technology sounds like a donut eating cop’s wet dream come true. ….. neat site ( http:\/\/www.g3pho.free-online.co.uk\/microwaves\/wideband.htm ) that … instead of the legitimate scientific purposes (eg. cancer\/particle detection). … input (like your lovely HERF gun frying the circuits or jamming RF signals\u00a0…<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

      \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      IEEE Radar bands<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Letter Designation<\/strong><\/td>\nFrequency range<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      X band<\/strong><\/td>\n8 to 12 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Ku band<\/td>\n12 to 18 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      K band<\/strong><\/td>\n18 to 26.5 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Ka band<\/strong><\/td>\n26.5 to 40 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Q band<\/td>\n33 to 50 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      U band<\/td>\n40 to 60 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      V band<\/td>\n50 to 75 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      E band<\/td>\n60 to 90 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      W band<\/td>\n75 to 110 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      F band<\/td>\n90 to 140 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      D band<\/td>\n110 to 170 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      G band<\/td>\n140 to 220 GHz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      #36GHZ \u00a0#cancer #radar<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

      <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      Frequency<\/th>\nBand<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
      10 kHz\u00a0to 30 kHz<\/td>\nVery Low Frequency (VLF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      30 kHz\u00a0to 300 kHz<\/td>\nLow Frequency (LF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      300 kHz\u00a0to 3 MHz<\/td>\nMedium Frequency (MF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      3 MHz\u00a0to 30 MHz<\/td>\nHigh Frequency (HF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      30 MHz\u00a0to 328.6 MHz<\/td>\nVery High Frequency (VHF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      328.6 MHz\u00a0to 450 MHz
      \n450 MHz to 470 MHz
      \n470 MHz to 806 MHz
      \n806 MHz to 960 MHz
      \n960 MHz to 2.3 GHz
      \n2.3 GHz to 2.9 GHz<\/td>\n      		Ultra High Frequency (UHF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      2.9 GHz\u00a0to 30 GHz<\/td>\nSuper High Frequency (SHF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      30 GHz<\/strong>\u00a0and above<\/td>\nExtremely High Frequency (EHF)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

       <\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Many baseball players and Umpires had brain tumours. \u00a0Did they all use cell phones? or was it the Radar Guns measuring the speed of the ball? Fullerton Informer states : ” All professional Baseball players have it rough. There is no doubt about it. I have known at least one personally and all the way […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":178,"menu_order":90,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"page-nosidebar.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-11061","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11061"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11061\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11098,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/11061\/revisions\/11098"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}