{"id":16273,"date":"2020-01-02T13:03:41","date_gmt":"2020-01-02T20:03:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/?p=16273"},"modified":"2020-01-02T13:07:15","modified_gmt":"2020-01-02T20:07:15","slug":"fcc-investigating-after-apple-iphones-failed-the-radiation-testing-homeem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/?p=16273","title":{"rendered":"FCC Investigating After Apple iPhone\u2019s Failed The Radiation Testing"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Often, we are told that concerning ourselves over technological radio frequencies is playing into the hands of rabid conspiracy theorists. Whether your concern is Wifi signals, or\u00a05G health risks, or cell phone emissions, it\u2019s all lumped in a basket of paranoia that\u2019s unfounded by science.<\/p>\n

That, at least, is what the experts have us believe.<\/p>\n

But then ever so often, a study, based in the same science that purports to disclaim these \u201cconspiracies,\u201d takes a sharp, harsh, u-turn. And when that happens, all bets fall off the table, at least temporarily.<\/p>\n

Last week, the Chicago Tribune ushered in one of those weeks when it released the results of radio frequency testing on the popular iPhone. The results, which put on display egregious non-compliance by way of Apple, has prompted an official FCC investigation. But it\u2019s also given inflated credence that cell phones may be bad for human health.<\/p>\n

iPhone 7 Radio frequency Exceeds FCC Standards<\/h2>\n

The Chicago Tribune carried out a comprehensive test on freshly ordered iPhone 7s. The iPhone 7s were derived from four different companies. During the testing, the iPhones were set to perform utilizing full power mode. The iPhones were placed in a liquid bath that imitates human flesh. The tub measured how much radio frequency each iPhone put out into the liquid.<\/p>\n

The results?<\/p>\n

The iPhone 7 consistently measured over the legal safety limit for radio frequency exposure.<\/p>\n

This is bad stuff, to say the least.<\/p>\n

The stunning results aren\u2019t just bad for Apple, but also for the FCC which provides assurance on its website that cell phones approved for sale will never exceed such limits. But this latest test paid for by the Chicago Tribune, put such guarantees in chaos.<\/p>\n

The Tribune\u2019s test was intended to show whether or not cell phone use is safe for people. Our newest generation will be exposed to smartphone devices for their entire lives. The study\u2019s poor safety assessment raises concerns that we may be polluting our bodies and potentially harming our genetics.<\/p>\n

Chicago Tribune iPhone Radio frequency Testing Logic<\/h2>\n

There were\u00a0two tests performed<\/a>. One was a standard test while the other was a modified test. The standard test too into account the FCC\u2019s guidelines. The distance from the body was determined by the manufacturer\u2019s premarket testing. This was 5, 10, and 15 millimeters in distance. The standard tests also tested non-premarket standards at 2 millimeters.<\/p>\n

The modified test took into account Apple\u2019s feedback to the results. In these tests, the allowance for power reduction sensors came into play.<\/p>\n

The FCC exposure limit is 1.6 W\/kg.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s how Apple iPhone 7 performed against Samsung and Motorola devices.\u00a0Pay attention to how drastically the iPhone 7 fails at 2mm distance from body.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
By Safe Guard EMF<\/a><\/span><\/span>|<\/span>January 2nd, 2020<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
https:\/\/safeguardemf.com\/fcc-investigating-after-apple-iphones-failed-the-radiation-testing\/<\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Often, we are told that concerning ourselves over technological radio frequencies is playing into the hands of rabid conspiracy theorists. Whether your concern is Wifi signals, or\u00a05G health risks, or cell phone emissions, it\u2019s all lumped in a basket of paranoia that\u2019s unfounded by science. That, at least, is what the experts have us believe. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[345,346,594,6,4,365],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-4g","category-5g","category-apple","category-cellular","category-wireless_devices","category-wireless-failed"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16273"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16275,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16273\/revisions\/16275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}