Elektrosmognews \u00a006. March 2015<\/p>\n
Study – Cell Phone Radiation grow tumors<\/strong>: “The unexpected always happens” – comment on the study by Prof. Dr. F.Adlkofer The unexpected always happens In prenatally with the carcinogen N-\u00c4thylnitrosoharnstoff (ENU) treated mice UMTS radiation caused at an intensity well below the current limit value is significantly higher than the effect of N-\u00c4thylnitrosoharnstoff beyond the tumor growth rate in the liver and lung. This effect was observed when the exposure began in the womb immediately after the administration of N-\u00c4thylnitrosoharnstoff and was continued for life after birth. The UMTS radiation alone led only to the formation of precancerous foci in the liver of animals. ” Read More >><\/strong><\/em>\u00a0\u00a0http:\/\/www.elektrosmognews.de\/news\/20150309_125914.html<\/a><\/p>\n see also >>\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>http:\/\/www.hese-project.org\/Forum\/allg\/index.php?id=7256<\/a><\/p>\n and here >>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0http:\/\/www.hese-project.org\/de\/forenportal\/index.php?lang=de<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n 6 March 2015<\/p>\n Highlights<\/strong><\/p>\n \u2022Tumor-promoting effects of RF-EMF exposed mice have been reported in 2010.<\/p>\n \u2022We have replicated the study with higher numbers of mice per group.<\/p>\n \u2022We could fully confirm the previous results, thus the effects are reproducible.<\/p>\n \u2022Apparently, no clear dose-response relationship is evident.<\/p>\n \u2022We hypothesize that metabolic changes are responsible for the effects observed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Abstract<\/strong><\/p>\n The vast majority of\u00a0in vitro<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0in vivo<\/em>\u00a0studies did not find cancerogenic effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF),\u00a0i.e.<\/em>\u00a0emitted by mobile phones and base stations. Previously published results from a pilot study with carcinogen-treated mice, however, suggested tumor-promoting effects of RF-EMF (Tillmann et al., 2010). We have performed a replication study using higher numbers of animals per group and including two additional exposure levels (0 (sham), 0.04, 0.4 and 2 W\/kg SAR). We could confirm and extend the originally reported findings. Numbers of tumors of the lungs and livers in exposed animals were significantly higher than in sham-exposed controls.<\/p>\n In addition, lymphomas were also found to be significantly elevated by exposure. \u00a0A clear dose-response effect is absent. We hypothesize that these tumor-promoting effects may be caused by metabolic changes due to exposure. \u00a0Since many of the tumor-promoting effects in our study were seen at low to moderate exposure levels (0.04 and 0.4 W\/kg SAR), thus well below exposure limits for the users of mobile phones, further studies are warranted to investigate the underlying mechanisms. Our findings may help to understand the repeatedly reported increased incidences of brain tumors in heavy users of mobile phones.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\nStatement by Prof. Dr. Franz Adlkofer, Pandora Foundation<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n
\nA painful lesson for the notorious slanderer Lerchl<\/strong>
\nand even more for industry and politics, in his “expertise” for many years made use of
\nJBS Haldane (1), large as a man and as a great scientist, has summarized the experiences of his life in one sentence: “The unexpected always happens” (The unexpected always happens). How right he has just Professor Alexander Lerchl from the private Jacobs University in Bremen has demonstrated. He, as a member of the Commission on Radiological Protection (SSK) for many years represented the radiation protection to mock the interests of industry and politics, while scientists Lennart Hardell and me, the research results were not consistent with the his, consistent, has denounced as data counterfeiters, suddenly published a work which, ad carries everything he has so far claimed absurdum.
\nIn my article “The all-clear from health risks of mobile phones by the German Mobile Telecommunication Research Programme (DMF) is based more on wishful thinking than on facts” in the series of Kompetenzinitiative I wrote in 2008 [1]:
\n“The volatile nature is recently a not yet published, but at a workshop in Berlin in May 2008 published study from the Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine in Hanover. In this study, it was shown that the UMTS radiation itself though has little genotoxic effect in terms of tumor initiation in mice, but quite distinct epigenetic has in terms of tumor promotion.<\/p>\n
\nAlthough the study was conducted by Tillmann et al. Published in 2010 [2], but fell despite their immense scientific importance largely forgotten. Whatever the reason, it was Lerchl, the loud preacher of the harmlessness of mobile phone radiation, reserved to repeat the Fraunhofer attempt by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS). Obviously, the results obtained were so clear that proved their cover-up from the outset to be impossible, given the numerous accomplices. Lerchl, who had hitherto always succeeded by devious test planning, mani-pulativer intervention in the experimental procedure and arbitrary data analysis to adapt its results to the wishes of its clients [3], nothing else was time left than the headlong rush to compete. He admits: “The discovered at the Fraunhofer Institute in 2010 Effects of tumors of the liver and the lungs were fully confirmed”. Although he denies the genotoxic potential of UMTS radiation, the Tillmann et al. have also observed for promotorischen effect, still now, but it’s only a matter of time before he will have to admit his mistake also.<\/p>\n\u00a0Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n