{"id":9280,"date":"2016-09-11T21:30:50","date_gmt":"2016-09-12T04:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/?p=9280"},"modified":"2016-12-11T21:33:28","modified_gmt":"2016-12-12T04:33:28","slug":"spain-ehs-legally-recognised","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/?p=9280","title":{"rendered":"Spain – EHS legally recognised"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\nThis is a special post which includes an auto-translation of the recent legal decision in the High Court of Madrid, which found\u00a0in favour of an EHS sufferer, an ex-employee at Ericsson.\u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Thanks to Shirley Temple for providing this document.\u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
There’s a link below the auto-translation to coverage of the case on the Towards Better Health blog.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
The name of this person has been redacted from the legal ruling, although it is in the public domain.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
The original legal judgement, written in Spanish,\u00a0was converted so that the actual text could be selected (it was a .pdf file of a scanned document), and then auto-translated. The resulting text is not easy to read – partly because of the legalese in the original, and partly because of the inherent limitations of auto-translations.<\/p>\n

I’ll replace this when a proper English translation is available, and in the meantime, the translated article on Towards Better Health provides a more readable\u00a0summary of this judgement.<\/p>\n

There are some links to further media coverage below the auto-translated ruling.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

\nHigh Court of Madrid Ruling Recognizes “Electrosensitivity” as Grounds for Total Permanent Disability – Towards Better Health, 4th August 2016
\n<\/strong>http:\/\/mieuxprevenir.blogspot.co.uk\/2016\/08\/spain-high-court-of-madrid-ruling.html<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Legal\u00a0Ruling (in Spanish)<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
https:\/\/app.box.com\/s\/w140a999q1wg3u9vuu93qksb1fgab2d6<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Auto-translation<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/strong>Superior\u00a0Court\u00a0of\u00a0Justice\u00a0of\u00a0Madrid\u00a0– Section\u00a0no 02\u00a0of the Social
\nAddress: CI\u00a0General\u00a0Martinez\u00a0Campos,\u00a027,\u00a0Plant\u00a02-28010
\nTelephone:\u00a0914931969
\nFax:\u00a0914931957<\/p>\n

NIG:\u00a028.079.00.4-2014\u00a0\/\u00a00044087
\nSupplication appeal\u00a0procedure\u00a0327\/2016-s<\/p>\n

ORIGIN:<\/p>\n

Labour Court\u00a0No. 11\u00a0of\u00a0Madrid\u00a0Social security\u00a01011\/2014
\nMatter:\u00a0Permanent disability<\/p>\n

Judgment\u00a0number:\u00a0588\/2016<\/p>\n

Ilmos. Mr<\/p>\n

Mr.\/Mrs.
\nMr.\/Mrs.
\nMr.\/Mrs ..<\/p>\n

In Madrid on 6 July two thousand and sixteen having seen in resource supplication the autos present Section 2 of the Social Chamber of the DC Superior Court Justice\u00a0composed by Ilmos. Messrs. Cited, according to the provisions made in the Article 117.1 of the Spanish Constitution,<\/p>\n

ON BEHALF OF S.M. THE KING<\/p>\n

AND BY THE AUTHORITY THAT THIS GIVES<\/p>\n

SPANISH VILLAGE<\/p>\n

<\/strong>He has issued\u00a0the following<\/p>\n

JUDGMENT<\/p>\n

In the\u00a0appeal for reversal\u00a0327\/2016,\u00a0formalized\u00a0by the\u00a0\/\u00a0the\u00a0LETRADO\u00a0Mr.\/Mrs.
\non behalf\u00a0of\u00a0Mr.\/Mrs.\u00a0[]
\nAgainst the judgment\u00a0dated\u00a030.12.2015\u00a0issued by the Court\u00a0de lo Social\u00a0No 11\u00a0de Madrid\u00a0in their\u00a0cars\u00a0Social security\u00a0number\u00a01011\/2014, followed at\u00a0Mr.\/Mrs\u00a0instance.\u00a0[] Versus\u00a0INSTITUTE\u00a0NATIONAL\u00a0TREASURY\u00a0GENERAL\u00a0SOCIAL SECURITY ANDSAFETY\u00a0SOCIAL,\u00a0in\u00a0reclamation\u00a0permanent disability.\u00a0Judge-Rapporteur\u00a0being\u00a0the\u00a0\/the\u00a0llmo.\/Ilma.\u00a0Mr. Mrs.\u00a0D.\/Dfla\u00a0[] and\u00a0deducted from\u00a0the actions\u00a0gotten\u00a0the following<\/p>\n

FACTUAL BACKGROUND<\/p>\n

FIRST:\u00a0As stated in\u00a0the\u00a0autos,\u00a0demand\u00a0was presented\u00a0by that\u00a0part\u00a0plaintiff\u00a0against thatdefendant.\u00a0It is\u00a0turned for\u00a0knowledge and\u00a0indicated\u00a0prosecution\u00a0the\u00a0Labour Court, which, following\u00a0the relevant\u00a0procedural\u00a0acts\u00a0processing\u00a0and after\u00a0conclusion of appropriate\u00a0acts of\u00a0oral proceedings in\u00a0which they\u00a0were\u00a0definitely\u00a0set\u00a0the respective positions of\u00a0the parties,\u00a0issued the\u00a0sentence\u00a0referenced above.<\/p>\n

SECOND:\u00a0In\u00a0the judgment\u00a0under appeal\u00a0in\u00a0supplication\u00a0the following facts\u00a0were recorded\u00a0as\u00a0expressly\u00a0declared\u00a0proven:<\/p>\n

<\/strong>FIRST\u00a0D.\u00a0[]\u00a0born\u00a0the day\u00a001.27.1969\u00a0and\u00a0document\u00a0Affiliate\u00a0Social Security\u00a0No []initiated a sick leave for temporary disability due to common illnesses as of 02\/07\/2012.<\/em>
\nSECOND.-\u00a0The actor\u00a0worked for the company\u00a0ERICSON,\u00a0flaunting\u00a0the professional category\u00a0Telecommunications Engineer;\u00a0It is its\u00a0regulatory base\u00a0of\u00a02.812.33\u00a0\u20ac\u00a0monthly.(Undisputed\u00a0fact)<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/strong>THIRD.-\u00a0case file\u00a0permanent\u00a0disability\u00a0plaintiff, after\u00a0examination and\u00a0recognitionthereof by the\u00a0evaluating physician, medical\u00a0summary\u00a0report\u00a0dated\u00a005.20.2014 was issued,\u00a0in which,\u00a0prior\u00a0diagnosis of\u00a0“anxiety-depressive\u00a0disorder with\u00a0predominance ofirritability\u00a0and difficulty\u00a0controlling\u00a0impulses.\u00a0Syndrome of\u00a0electrosensitivity\u00a0(EMS),multiple\u00a0chemical\u00a0sensitivity\u00a0syndrome\u00a0(SOM) of\u00a0irritable bowel syndrome,\u00a0dry\u00a0mucous membranes\u00a0“, regarding the organizational and functional limitations,\u00a0reads as follows:
\n“Anxiety-depressive disorder prevalence of irritability and\u00a0difficulty with for control impulses. irritable bowel syndrome, dry mucous membranes, without sequelae defmitivas.
\n<\/strong>It is not possible to draw definite functional limitations syndrome electrosensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) syndrome on the basis of consensual scientific information and that can be implemented in the considerations of WHO and Consensus Document on Chemical Hypersensitivity Multiple\u00a0the Ministry for Health, Social Policy and Equality 2011. they stresses that “there is little scientific evidence to support the possible existence of cases of hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields” (wHO) and “heterogeneity and vagueness of symptoms and\u00a0the lack of agreement on a profile empirically validated, favored doubts about accepting MCS as a disease entity with a specific underlying etiology “(Ministry of Health)”;\u00a0<\/em>finally concluding, that report, that “it is not possible to establish permanent sequelae, not a cause-effect franca of symptoms and signs with exposure to the agents referred to not having scientific evidence of the experimental method”(Folios 20 to 25 and 40 to 43)<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/strong>FOURTH.-\u00a0Upon issuance\u00a0of that\u00a0medical\u00a0summary report\u00a0by the Task\u00a0Disability Assessment\u00a0(EVI)\u00a0proposal\u00a0dated\u00a006\/06\/2014\u00a0issued\u00a0an opinion\u00a0that\u00a0determined thefollowing\u00a0clinical picture\u00a0residual:\u00a0“anxiety-depressive disorder\u00a0Irritability\u00a0DOMINANCEWITH\u00a0DIFFICULTY\u00a0AND\u00a0CONTROL\u00a0IMPULSE.\u00a0SYNDROME\u00a0electrosensitivity\u00a0(EHS),SYNDROME\u00a0MULTIPLE\u00a0CHEMICAL\u00a0SENSITIVITY\u00a0(SOM).\u00a0Irritable bowel.\u00a0DRY Mucous’\u00a0‘is the non-qualification of the worker as permanently disabled proposing not to submit anatomical or functional reductions that reduce or remove their working capacity. (Folio\u00a039)<\/em>
\n
\n<\/strong>FIFTH.-\u00a0By\u00a0INSS\u00a0decision was given\u00a0as of\u00a006\/06\/2014\u00a0for which\u00a0she remembered\u00a0actordeny\u00a0the provision of\u00a0permanent disability\u00a0for not meeting\u00a0injuries\u00a0suffers\u00a0a sufficient degree of\u00a0decrease in\u00a0their ability to work, to be\u00a0constitutive of\u00a0permanent disability.(Folio\u00a031)<\/p>\n

<\/strong>SIX.- against that decision of the INSS, the plaintiff made a previous claim, which was dismissed. (Folios 58\u00a0to 64)<\/em><\/p>\n

<\/strong>THIRD:\u00a0In\u00a0the judgment\u00a0under appeal\u00a0in\u00a0supplication\u00a0the following\u00a0judgment was rendered\u00a0or\u00a0part:\u00a0“THAT\u00a0dismissing\u00a0the lawsuit filed by\u00a0D.\u00a0[]\u00a0FACING THE\u00a0NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF\u00a0SOCIAL\u00a0SECURITY\u00a0(INSS)\u00a0AND\u00a0FACING THE\u00a0GENERALTREASURY\u00a0OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY\u00a0(TGSS),\u00a0IN\u00a0CLAIMS\u00a0ON\u00a0PERMANENT DISABILITY,\u00a0SHOULD I\u00a0acquit\u00a0THE\u00a0CLAIMS\u00a0OF\u00a0ENTITIES\u00a0co-defendants\u00a0made against him\u00a0”<\/p>\n

<\/strong>FOURTH:\u00a0Facing\u00a0then appealed\u00a0that judgment\u00a0was announced\u00a0by the applicant,Mr.\/Mrs\u00a0part.\u00a0[\u00a0 ],\u00a0formalizing it\u00a0later;\u00a0such an action\u00a0was\u00a0not contested\u00a0by the counterparty.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>FIFTH:\u00a0Elevated\u00a0by the\u00a0Labour Court\u00a0reference\u00a0the main case, together with\u00a0the separate\u00a0then appealed\u00a0piece,\u00a0this\u00a0Social Chamber,\u00a0had the same\u00a0entry in this\u00a0section,dictating\u00a0the corresponding\u00a0and subsequent\u00a0providence\u00a0for processing\u00a0fit.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>SIXTH:\u00a0Appointed\u00a0Judge-Rapporteur, the clearance\u00a0of the cars\u00a0were available\u00a0for\u00a0the same\u00a0knowledge and study, indicating\u00a0the\u00a007.06.2016\u00a0day for\u00a0voting\u00a0acts\u00a0and\u00a0failure.
\nIn view\u00a0of the above\u00a0factual background,\u00a0the following\u00a0are made\u00a0by\u00a0this\u00a0section\u00a0Room<\/p>\n

THE LAW<\/p>\n

FIRST\u00a0Against the\u00a0judgment of the\u00a0Labour Court\u00a0No.\u00a011 of the\u00a0city\u00a0in\u00a0car\u00a0no.\u00a01O11\u00a0\/ 2014\u00a0has\u00a0brought\u00a0Counsel\u00a0then appealed\u00a0the claimant\u00a0under\u00a0the provisions of\u00a0Article 193\u00a0b)\u00a0and\u00a0c)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0two groups\u00a0claiming\u00a0LRJS\u00a0grounds of\u00a0appeal:
\nIn the first,\u00a0asks:
\na)\u00a0The\u00a0second\u00a0revision of the\u00a0proven fact\u00a0giving\u00a0the following relationship:
\n“The actor\u00a0worked for the company\u00a0ERICSON,\u00a0flaunting\u00a0the\u00a0professional\u00a0categoryTelecommunications Engineer, and its\u00a0regulatory base\u00a0of\u00a02.812.33\u00a0\u20ac\u00a0monthly\u00a0(notdisputed fact).<\/p>\n

The tasks\u00a0in their profession\u00a0are:\u00a0analyze,\u00a0develop, develop\u00a0and implement\u00a0test casessoftware\u00a0and\u00a0hardware:\u00a0coordinate,\u00a0lead\u00a0and manage\u00a0test procedure:\u00a0check the configuration\u00a0and integration of\u00a0a node,\u00a0a network or\u00a0system:\u00a0scope of these activitiescould include:\u00a0introduction of\u00a0software,\u00a0software\u00a0expansion\u00a0level,\u00a0expansion of\u00a0software(functionality\u00a0and capacity)\u00a0and migration\u00a0of the same:\u00a0the ultimate goal is\u00a0to deliver\u00a0to the client\u00a0node, network\u00a0or system.
\nThese\u00a0activities are carried out\u00a0both\u00a0offices\u00a0Ericsson\u00a0(office area,\u00a0area\u00a0models) andcustomer premises\u00a0(equipment rooms\u00a0and offices)\u00a0and in constant\u00a0daily contact\u00a0with computers in\u00a0an environment\u00a0where there are\u00a0electromagnetic fields,\u00a0mobile connections\u00a0and\u00a0wireless\u00a0radio.\u00a0”<\/p>\n

b)\u00a0The addition of\u00a0a new\u00a0seventh\u00a0ordinal\u00a0proven fact\u00a0with the following wording:
\n“It is\u00a0considered\u00a0by\u00a0the Prevention Service\u00a0of the company that\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0is particularly sensitive\u00a0person\u00a0and that once\u00a0the possibilities of adaptation\u00a0to other activities\u00a0and\u00a0mode of\u00a0work according to\u00a0the medical examination\u00a0and medical reportsanalyzed.\u00a0IS\u00a0NOT SUITABLE\u00a0for\u00a0perform\u00a0their profession.
\nFor that reason and\u00a0given the impossibility of\u00a0reassignment\u00a0of the employee to\u00a0another job\u00a0in which\u00a0electromagnetic fields\u00a0affecting\u00a0their health\u00a0are not present,\u00a0the\u00a0company proceeds to\u00a0end the\u00a0employment relationship\u00a0that united them\u00a0because of theineptitude\u00a0develop their work,\u00a0given the existence of\u00a0a clear situation of\u00a0disability.\u00a0”<\/p>\n

<\/strong>c) The revision of the fourth proven fact giving the following wording:”Upon issuance of the said medical summary report by the Disability Assessment Team (EVI) opinion dated 06\/06\/2014 proposal in which determined the following clinical residual was issued:” anxiety-depressive disorder predominating\u00a0irritability and difficulty impulse control, electrosensitivity syndrome\u00a0(EHS), Multiple Chemical Sensitivity syndrome (MCS),\u00a0Irritable bowel syndrome,\u00a0dry mucous” non-qualifying worked as permanently disabled by not presenting anatomical or reductions functional proposed\u00a0that diminish or nullify its labor capacity (Folio 39).
\nAccording to expert report Hospital of Guadalajara.\u00a0“In the presence of this exposure to electromagnetic fields, such as that found in the workplace, appear in the patient’s symptoms of hypersensitivity especially relating to (headache, tinnitus, insomnia and other sleep disorders, fatigue and fatigability, changes nervous system\u00a0mood, nervousness, irritability or aggressiveness, impaired concentration and short-term memory, etc.), and to improve away from their exposure. ”
\nIn the second group of reasons for appeal alleges infringement of Article 137.5 of the General Social Security Law;\u00a0alternatively point 4 of the same article;\u00a0and the jurisprudential doctrine cites in its application.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>SECOND.-\u00a0interested\u00a0by the applicant to\u00a0the fact\u00a0proved\u00a0second of\u00a0the\u00a0judgment of theCourt\u00a0is\u00a0inconsequential\u00a0to\u00a0the decision\u00a0of the case\u00a0because the content\u00a0obligational\u00a0asdefined\u00a0in the professional\u00a0category\u00a0that\u00a0is what\u00a0must be evaluated\u00a0and not a\u00a0specific job\u00a0to determine whether\u00a0or not\u00a0the worker is\u00a0in\u00a0situation total\u00a0permanent disability\u00a0forusual occupation.\u00a0Which prevents\u00a0the first\u00a0estimated\u00a0plea\u00a0because it already\u00a0hasproven\u00a0in the\u00a0professional\u00a0category\u00a0second\u00a0fact.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>THIRD:- If you must\u00a0be estimated\u00a0the addition\u00a0of the new\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0seventh\u00a0ordinal\u00a0interested\u00a0in its application\u00a0because it refers to\u00a0factual information\u00a0susceptible\u00a0to failuretranscend\u00a0the dispute\u00a0whose purpose is to\u00a0determine\u00a0the capacity or\u00a0incapacity\u00a0of the actor\u00a0for the performance\u00a0of work.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>FOURTH.-\u00a0modification\u00a0interesting for\u00a0the proven fact\u00a0four of the judgment\u00a0of\u00a0Courtconsists of\u00a0the addition\u00a0of a\u00a0second paragraph\u00a0to its\u00a0literal\u00a0content that\u00a0alludes\u00a0the report of the\u00a0Hospital\u00a0of\u00a0Guadalajara.\u00a0This\u00a0expert report\u00a0in the case file\u00a0and refers to\u00a0circumstances or\u00a0susceptible\u00a0pathologies\u00a0arise\u00a0when\u00a0the worker\u00a0is exposed to\u00a0electromagnetic fields.\u00a0What\u00a0it is implicitly\u00a0included\u00a0in saying that\u00a0suffering\u00a0Electrosensitivity\u00a0SYNDROME\u00a0(SQM),\u00a0making it\u00a0unnecessary to add\u00a0to\u00a0mode\u00a0directlyderived\u00a0greater detail the\u00a0consequences of such\u00a0pathology they are\u00a0unwritten\u00a0and included\u00a0to state that\u00a0suffers.\u00a0What\u00a0makes\u00a0unnecessary\u00a0by\u00a0not\u00a0estimable\u00a0this ground ofappeal.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>FIFTH.- Once resolved define\u00a0the course of application of the rules\u00a0regulating substantive legal incapacity.\u00a0ie Articles 136 and 137 of the\u00a0LGSS, the resulting form as described above.\u00a0in view thereof it is reasonably\u00a0accredited total permanent disability of the claimant for normal profession\u00a0Telecommunications engineer because of chemical sensitivity syndrome or suffering\u00a0Electromagnetic hypersensitivity to the Spanish Ministry of Health has called on\u00a0its version of the international classification of ICD-9-CM disease within the group\u00a0no specific allergies (code 995.3).\u00a0Allergy that causes the sufferer in loss\u00a0induced tolerance, for most recurrent outbreaks, the RF pollution,\u00a0cordless phones, mobile phone antennas, WIFI, forcing suffers a quine\u00a0minimize its exposition in the home and work environments and avoid places with\u00a0electromagnetic pollution.\u00a0These circumstances leading to the reasonable decision to declare the applicant in\u00a0situation of total permanent disability for usual occupation Engineer\u00a0Telecommunications derived from common disease entitled to receive the benefit\u00a0economiea in corresponding application of the provisions of Article 137.4 of the General Social Security Law.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>SIXTH.-.\u00a0If,\u00a0as it has been\u00a0argued\u00a0above.\u00a0the\u00a0actor is\u00a0unable to work\u00a0in environments with\u00a0electromagnetic pollution,\u00a0this\u00a0situation\u00a0does not occur in\u00a0all\u00a0types of environmentsand places, so\u00a0if you can work\u00a0in so-called\u00a0“white\u00a0zones” they do not have that\u00a0kind ofcontamination;\u00a0and as for the\u00a0chemical\u00a0sensitivity\u00a0syndrome\u00a0who also\u00a0suffers frommultiple,\u00a0as\u00a0argued in\u00a0the legal basis\u00a0Fourth\u00a0judgment of the\u00a0Court\u00a0“not possible todraw definite\u00a0consequences”,\u00a0and this lack of\u00a0permanent limitations\u00a0prevents\u00a0estimateits claim to be\u00a0declared for\u00a0absolute permanent disability\u00a0pursuant to the\u00a0provisions of Article\u00a0136.1\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0LGSS.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>HAVING SEEN the\u00a0previous rules\u00a0and\u00a0other\u00a0general\u00a0application,<\/p>\n

FAILED<\/p>\n

Estimating\u00a0that\u00a0partly\u00a0and partly\u00a0dismissing the\u00a0appeal for reversal\u00a0Counsel\u00a0filed by\u00a0theapplicant against the\u00a0judgment of\u00a0the Labour Court\u00a0Social\u00a0n\u00a0\u00b0\u00a011 of the\u00a0city\u00a0in\u00a0carsnum.\u00a01011\/2014,\u00a0we must reverse\u00a0and\u00a0reverse\u00a0leaving\u00a0void\u00a0the contested decision and, instead, resolution\u00a0estimating the\u00a0alternative claim\u00a0contained in the applicationmade by Mr\u00a0[]\u00a0against\u00a0INSS\u00a0and\u00a0TGSS, we must declare\u00a0and declare that\u00a0the actor\u00a0is in\u00a0situation\u00a0total permanent disability\u00a0for\u00a0usual occupation\u00a0Engineer\u00a0Telecommunications\u00a0derived from\u00a0common\u00a0disease\u00a0entitled\u00a0to receive the benefit economic\u00a0equivalent to 55% of their\u00a0base salary\u00a0of\u00a0\u20ac\u00a02.812,33.\u00a0with\u00a0economic effects\u00a0from the day\u00a020.05.\u00a02014;\u00a0condemning\u00a0the\u00a0co-defendants\u00a0Entities\u00a0subscribe\u00a0with\u00a0improvements that\u00a0are legally due.<\/p>\n

<\/strong>WITHOUT\u00a0COSTAS.<\/p>\n

Merge\u00a0the original\u00a0of this judgment,\u00a0by\u00a0this order,\u00a0the\u00a0Book of Sentences\u00a0of this\u00a0SectionRoom.<\/p>\n

Certifications\u00a0issued\u00a0of this\u00a0statement for\u00a0binding\u00a0separate piece\u00a0or\u00a0roll\u00a0supination, which\u00a0will be filed\u00a0in this Court,\u00a0and\u00a0the main\u00a0cars.<\/p>\n

Notice is\u00a0this judgment\u00a0to the parties and\u00a0to the Office of\u00a0the Court\u00a0Superior\u00a0of Justice.<\/p>\n

Some Spanish articles on the case, with English auto-translations afterwards<\/strong>La Vanguardia, 2nd August 2016
\n<\/strong>Un \u2018teleco\u2019 con electrosensibilidad logra la incapacidad para trabajar entre wifis<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.lavanguardia.com\/vida\/20160802\/403624742652\/electrohipersensibilidad-sindrome-neurologico-prestacion-por-incapacidad.html<\/a><\/p>\n

A ‘teleco’ electrosensitivity achieved with the inability to work between wifis<\/p>\n

https:\/\/translate.google.co.uk\/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lavanguardia.com%2Fvida%2F20160802%2F403624742652%2Felectrohipersensibilidad-sindrome-neurologico-prestacion-por-incapacidad.html&edit-text=&act=url<\/a><\/p>\n

Heraldo<\/strong><\/a>, 2nd August 2016
\n<\/strong>Un ingeniero de telecomunicaciones con electrosensibilidad logra la incapacidad laboral<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.heraldo.es\/noticias\/sociedad\/2016\/08\/02\/un-ingeniero-telecomunicaciones-con-electrosensibilidad-logra-incapacidad-laboral-993859-310.html<\/a><\/p>\n

A telecommunications engineer with electrosensitivity achieves incapacity<\/p>\n

https:\/\/translate.google.com\/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.heraldo.es%2Fnoticias%2Fsociedad%2F2016%2F08%2F02%2Fun-ingeniero-telecomunicaciones-con-electrosensibilidad-logra-incapacidad-laboral-993859-310.html&edit-text=&act=url<\/a><\/p>\n

El Pais, 2nd August 2016
\n<\/strong>\u201cSufro electrosensibilidad y mi calidad de vida es vivir aislado\u201d<\/p>\n

http:\/\/ccaa.elpais.com\/ccaa\/2016\/08\/02\/madrid\/1470150997_885665.html<\/a><\/p>\n

“I Suffer electrosensitivity and my quality of life is to live isolated”<\/p>\n

https:\/\/translate.google.com\/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fccaa.elpais.com%2Fccaa%2F2016%2F08%2F02%2Fmadrid%2F1470150997_885665.html&edit-text=&act=url<\/a><\/p>\n

Noticias Juridicas, 3rd August 2016<\/strong><\/p>\n

Una sentencia considera por primera vez la “electrosensibilidad” como causa de incapacidad permanente total<\/p>\n

http:\/\/noticias.juridicas.com\/actualidad\/jurisprudencia\/11248-una-sentencia-considera-por-primera-vez-la-quot\/<\/a><\/p>\n

A statement considers first the “electrosensitivity” as grounds for total permanent disability<\/p>\n

https:\/\/translate.google.com\/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fnoticias.juridicas.com%2Factualidad%2Fjurisprudencia%2F11248-una-sentencia-considera-por-primera-vez-la-quot%2F&edit-text=&act=url<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
Original Posting :<\/div>\n
https:\/\/beingelectrosensitive.blogspot.ca\/2016\/08\/spain-ehs-legally-recognised.html<\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 This is a special post which includes an auto-translation of the recent legal decision in the High Court of Madrid, which found\u00a0in favour of an EHS sufferer, an ex-employee at Ericsson.\u00a0 Thanks to Shirley Temple for providing this document.\u00a0 There’s a link below the auto-translation to coverage of the case on the Towards Better […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,349,3,311],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ehs","category-electromagnetic-sensitivity","category-health_and_safety","category-spain"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=9280"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9280\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9281,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9280\/revisions\/9281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=9280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=9280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emrabc.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=9280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}