## 5G Causing Illnesses, Stabbing Feeling, Migraines, Dizziness, Vertigo, Skin Rashes, Blurred Vision And More

by

5G uses Millimetre Waves technology.  Testing of the frequencies to be used in 5g have shown that millimetre waves exposed to the skin have serious effects.  Industry Canada has proposed to use 24, 28 and 38 Ghz.

This technology is also used for other purposes, and has the same effects :

XRAYS ( also using Millimetre Waves :  20 to 38 GHz )

and

ACTIVE DENIAL / DIRECTED ENERGY ( using Millimetre Waves : 95 GHz waves ).

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## Small Cells, Mini Cell Towers, Wireless Facilities And Health: Letters From Scientists On The Health Risk Of 5G

Letters From Experts on The Impact of Wireless Antennas on Public Health

https://ehtrust.org/small-cells-mini-cell-towers-health-letters-scientists-health-risk-5g/

https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/5g-networks-iot-scientific-overview-human-health-risks/

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## Electromagnetic interactions of human skin and other complex biological systems

Potential Risks to Human Health from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems : Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD and Yuri Feldman

presented at Expert Forum: Wireless Radiation and Human Health, Hebrew University Medical School, January 23-26 2017

Published on Feb 15, 2017

This is from the 2017 Expert Forum on Wireless and Health. All presentations from this conference are availible at

Research finds human sweat ducts are antennas for millimeter waves (5G),

resulting in high levels of radiation absorption by sweat ducts; presented at NIH/NIEHS sponsored conference

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## The remote sensing of mental stress from the electromagnetic reflection coefficient of human skin in the sub-THz range

July 2012  Safrai E1, Ishai PBCaduff APuzenko APolsman AAgranat AJFeldman Y

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22170380

Abstract

Recent work has demonstrated that the reflection coefficient of human skin in the frequency range from 95 to 110 GHz (W band) mirrors the temporal relaxation of stress induced by physical exercise. In this work, we extend these findings to show that in the event of a subtle trigger to stress, such as mental activity, a similar picture of response emerges. Furthermore, the findings are extended to cover not only the W band (75-110 GHz), but also the frequency band from 110 to 170 GHz (D band). We demonstrate that mental stress, induced by the Stroop effect and recorded by the galvanic skin response (GSR), can be correlated to the reflection coefficient in the aforementioned frequency bands. Intriguingly, a light physical stress caused by repeated hand gripping clearly showed an elevated stress level in the GSR signal, but was largely unnoted in the reflection coefficient in the D band. The implication of this observation requires further validation.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## Human skin as arrays of helical antennas in the millimeter and submillimeter wave range.

March 2008  Feldman Y1, Puzenko ABen Ishai PCaduff AAgranat AJ.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18517913

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51394628_Human_Skin_as_Arrays_of_Helical_Antennas_in_the_Millimeter_and_Submillimeter_Wave_Range

Abstract

Recent studies of the minute morphology of the skin by optical coherence tomography showed that the sweat ducts in human skin are helically shaped tubes, filled with a conductive aqueous solution. A computer simulation study of these structures in millimeter and submillimeter wave bands show that the human skin functions as an array of low-Q helical antennas. Experimental evidence is presented that the spectral response in the sub-Terahertz region is governed by the level of activity of the perspiration system. It is also correlated to physiological stress as manifested by the pulse rate and the systolic blood pressure.

PMID:  18517913  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.128102

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## A New Paradigm in Human Sensitivity? Recognition of the Human Condition via the Exposure of Sweat Ducts to sub-THz Waves

Yuri D Feldman, Paul Ben Ishai, Alexander Puzenko, Noa Betzalel, Anna Kochnev

Goal: In the interaction of microwave radiation and human beings, the skin is traditionally considered as just an absorbing sponge stratum filled with water. In 2008, we showed that this view is flawed when we demonstrated that the coiled portion of the sweat duct in upper skin layer could be regarded as a helical antenna in the sub-THz band. Experimentally we showed that the reflectance of the human skin in the sub-THz region depends on the intensity of perspiration, and correlates with levels of human stress (physical, mental and emotional). Furthermore, in 2014 we detected circular dichroism in the reflectance from the skin, a signature of the axial mode of a helical antenna. The full ramifications of what these findings represent in the human condition are still very unclear. How does control of the sweat duct by the central nervous system influence the reflection we found? Since the Sympathetic Nerve Response controls sweat gland activity and this activity affects the reflectance, our findings suggest the possibility of a direct reading of the human mental state with all that this implies. This project intends to address these fundamental issues: Does this signal imply biofeedback? Can it be exploited in fields such as medical diagnostics, remote sensing, homeland security, etc.? These considerations, coupled with the view that the interaction of the sweat duct with an EM wave is based on their helical morphology, allow us to believe that the time is ripe for opening a new area of research. This is also poignant now because of the interest of industry to exploit precisely this signal range (100 GHz – 400 GHz) for communications and possible consequent side effects on the public

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## Microwave dielectric spectroscopy study of water dynamics in normal and contaminated raw bovine milk.

June 1, 2017     Agranovich D1, Ishai PB2, Katz G3, Bezman D3, Feldman Y4.

Abstract

The role of water in bovine milk is more complicated than that of a background solvent. To understand the interaction between water and the constituents of milk, an extensive dielectric study of the γ-dispersion of raw bovine milk was carried out over the frequency range 0.1 – 50GHz and the interval of temperatures (10°C-42°C). Samples were provided by utilizing an extended donor pool. The results reveal that the temperature dependence of the characteristic relaxation times is described by the Arrhenius law. Furthermore, it conforms to a Meyer-Neldel compensation, whereby the pre-factor of the relaxation times is dependent on the activation energy. This entropy/enthalpy compensation is traced to the interaction between bulk water dynamic clusters and other milk constituents. A statistical correlation between the Somatic Cell Count, a traditional measure of milk quality, and the relaxation times is provided as well, opening new vistas for the industrial classification of milk.

KEYWORDS:  Bovine milk; Conductivity; Dielectric relaxation; Dielectric spectroscopy; Mastitis; Meyer-Neldel compensation; Somatic cell count; Water

PMID: 28384618  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.03.051

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

. 2014 Nov 15; 112(10): 2423–2431.
Published online 2014 Aug 13.

## Effects of millimeter wave irradiation and equivalent thermal heating on the activity of individual neurons in the leech ganglion

Abstract

Many of today’s radiofrequency-emitting devices in telecommunication, telemedicine, transportation safety, and security/military applications use the millimeter wave (MMW) band (30–300 GHz). To evaluate the biological safety and possible applications of this radiofrequency band for neuroscience and neurology, we have investigated the physiological effects of low-intensity 60-GHz electromagnetic irradiation on individual neurons in the leech midbody ganglia. We applied incident power densities of 1, 2, and 4 mW/cm2 to the whole ganglion for a period of 1 min while recording the action potential with a standard sharp electrode electrophysiology setup. For comparison, the recognized U.S. safe exposure limit is 1 mW/cm2 for 6 min. During the exposure to MMWs and gradual bath heating at a rate of 0.04°C/s (2.4°C/min), the ganglionic neurons exhibited similar dose-dependent hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane and decrease in the action potential amplitude. However, narrowing of the action potential half-width during MMW irradiation at 4 mW/cm2 was 5 times more pronounced compared with that during equivalent bath heating of 0.6°C. Even more dramatic difference in the effects of MMW irradiation and bath heating was noted in the firing rate, which was suppressed at all applied MMW power densities and increased in a dose-dependent manner during gradual bath heating. The mechanism of enhanced narrowing of action potentials and suppressed firing by MMW irradiation, compared with that by gradual bath heating, is hypothesized to involve specific coupling of MMW energy with the neuronal plasma membrane.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4233276/?fbclid=IwAR2a8dMSUsj4zD46Kc9km98923wnNiV2AB6PkibqKzfkZb9p3Py62hEHTzs

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## “5G And The IOT: Scientific Overview Of Human Health Risks”

Cindy Russel MD – Overview of Dangers 5G     sccma-mcms  Bulletin

## A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a Smart Nation or Contribute to an Unhealthy One?

Dr. Cindy Russell
V.P. Community Health, SCCMA/MCMS

“It would greatly extend FCC’s current policy of the mandatory irradiation of the public without adequate prior study of the potential health impact and assurance of safety. It would irradiate everyone, including the most vulnerable to harm from radiofrequency radiation: pregnant women, unborn children, young children, teenagers, men of reproductive age, the elderly, the disabled, and the chronically ill.”Ronald Powell, PhD, Letter to FCC on 5G expansion (7)

sccma-mcms.org/Portals/19/assets/docs/17ZZ-PDF.pdf

## Why We Should Oppose 5G on Health Grounds

February 20, 2017 Ronald M. Powell, Ph.D.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## The Effect of Microwaves on The Central Nervous System

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## mmWave Radar Return for Characterization of Burned Skin

Oct 17, 2019

Sean Korphi    Vincent Mei

Abstract

This publication describes techniques and systems directed to classifying skin injury using a radar propagation technique to measure the health of tissue below the surface of the skin. The millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequency of the electromagnetic spectrum can be broadcast from an active sensor(s) (e.g., transmitting antenna(s)) on a computing device towards the skin of a person. The mmWaves penetrate the skin and reflectively scatter differently for various tissues and burn types due to changes in dielectric properties. Sensor(s) (e.g., receiving antenna(s)) on the computing device can sense the scattering of the mmWaves reflected by the skin and collect data for processing. The data can be processed using data models supported by machine learning algorithms to categorize an assessment of skin injury. The computing device can further assess skin injury through the use of passive sensors such as light sensors (i.e., camera) or infrared (IR) sensors.

https://www.tdcommons.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3653&context=dpubs_series

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## and Local Biochemical Release From Cells at Supraphysiologic Temperatures

Donald A. Stewart, T. R. Gowrishankar, and James C. Weaver

Abstract — Energy dissipation by millimeter-wavelength electromagnetic-radiation (MMW; f ∼ 3 − 300 GHz) exposure to mammalian skin occurs within the outer surface. The penetration depth is less than 1 mm for frequencies above 25 GHz. A trans- port-lattice system model is used, which incorporates two spatial scales to estimate heat and chemical transport in rat skin in vivo: 1) a layered skin model involving the outer several millimeters of the body coupled to 2) a whole body model.

The whole body model accounts for core-body heating, which provides a time-dependent reference temperature for blood perfusion in the skin model as well as the chemical concentration in the bloodstream and renal elimination. The model’s thermal response to MMW exposure is consistent with the subcutaneous and colonic temperature mea- surements reported for 75 mW · cm−2 and 40-min exposures at 94 GHz in anesthetized rats. The simultaneous involvement of two biophysical mechanisms that create different chemical changes in response to the field exposure is also considered.

First, a traditional nonspecific thermal-injury indicator is used to estimate denaturing molecular change due directly to heating as a function of depth in the skin. Rat skin exposed in vivo to 75 mW · cm−2 for long times (40 min) has a significant direct injury, while a 10-s exposure to 1 W · cm−2 results in a much less direct injury.

Second, the biophysical mechanism of biochemical release through cell membranes within the tissue regions that reach supraphys- iologic temperatures is also considered. The released molecules are delivered to other skin regions by diffusion and into the bloodstream by perfusion, where according to our hypothesis, the molecules interact with susceptible cells. This raises the possibility of additional indirect injury at nearby deeper skin regions that experience insignificant heating. Biochemical release may also lead to injury at distant sites within the body by perfusion clearance that transfers molecules into the systemic circulation to reach other susceptible cells. The hypothesis of simultaneous direct- and indirect-injury mechanisms is also illustrated by creating and solving didactic, coupled thermal, and chemical transport-lattice models.

http://epore.mit.edu/papers/2006_7.pdf

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## Development and mm-Wave Exposure to the Skin

Marvin C. Ziskin, MD

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

# Millimeter Wave Reflectometry and Imaging for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Burn Injuries

• Published 2017
• Mathematics, Computer Science
• IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Accurate assessment of the degree of burn in human skin is critically important for burn technicians and physicians when making treatment decisions. Millimeter wave reflectometry and imaging are potential diagnostic tools capable of distinguishing between healthy and burned skin, as the dielectric properties of the latter are significantly different from that of the former. In this paper, the commonly used layered model of human skin is used to simulate the reflection properties of skin with varying degrees of burn, at Ka-band (26.5-40 GHz), to demonstrate the potential for such diagnosis. Measurements of complex reflection coefficient are also conducted on a pigskin with and without medical dressing, which is a close mimic to human skin. Good agreement is obtained, in amplitude and variation trends in the reflection coefficient results, between simulation and measurement results, indicating the potential effectiveness and feasibility of burn degree diagnosis by localized millimeter wave reflectometry and complex reflection coefficient $L^{{\mathrm {2}}}$ -Norm analysis. Finally, synthetic aperture radar imaging technique is used to examine the efficacy of imaging for burn wound at V-band (50-75 GHz). In addition, the effectiveness of localized and imaging methods for evaluating burns covered by medical dressings is also demonstrated

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## Letter To The FCC From Dr. Yael Stein MD In Opposition To 5G Spectrum Frontiers

Environmental Health Trust

FCC Commissioners
U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

July 9, 2016

Topic: G5 millimeter wave technology (Sub Terahertz frequencies/ Sub-THz)

A group of physicists from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, together with several physicians, have researched “G5” millimeter wave technology (Sub Terahertz frequencies) and its interaction with the human body. I am a physician who participated in this research.

Human sweat glands as helical antennas:

The study of human sweat glands as helical antennas conducted by our group in Prof. Feldman’s lab, began by looking at images of the skin created by optical coherence tomography (OCT), which revealed that the tips of the sweat ducts that expel the sweat from the gland to the pore at the surface of the skin have a helical structure (Knuttel et al, 2004; Lademann, Otberg et al. 2007; Tripathi et al, 2015). This, and the fact that the dielectric permittivity of the dermis is higher than that of the epidermis, leads one to assume that, as electromagnetic entities, the sweat ducts could be regarded as imperfect helical antennas (Feldman, et al. 2008, 2009; Kawase and Hayashi, 2011; Yang, Donnan et al. 2011; Hayut et al, 2013, 2014).

The prediction of this simulation was that there would be an influence of the sweat duct on reflected signal around 90 GHz and an even increased sensitivity in higher frequencies. Proton hopping was suggested as the phenomenon that causes the conductivity inside the sweat gland. Taking into consideration a drop in the electric potential caused by the difference in the pH values between the skin surface (pH=5.5) and the dermis (pH=6.9), one can posit the existence of an electromotive force that would provide the necessary additional charge flow in the duct.

Thus, the sweat ducts possess all the required features to reveal antenna-like behavior in the extremely high frequency band (EHF band or the millimeter/submillimeter band).

These assumptions were supported by a series of computer simulations which showed that the spectral response of the ducts indeed coincides with the prediction of the antenna theory.

Implications:

Computer simulations using the Finite Differences Time Domain (FDTD) method have clearly shown that sweat gland ducts are high absorption structures of mm-waves. SAR values were about one order of magnitude higher with the sweat gland ducts and highly localized to within the sweat gland ducts (Shafirstein and Moros, 2011). Temperatures computed using a bio-heat equation demonstrated that the temperature maximum was moved toward the epidermis which is populated by pain nerve fibers and heat-sensitive keratinocytes. This situation is closer to direct contact with a hot surface, indicating that exposure to high power GHz irradiation should result in a sudden acute pain response even without direct heating of the stratum corneum.

This phenomenon may potentially affect all humans and especially susceptible members of the public using or being exposed to communications devices in the sub-terahertz waveband.

It is advisable that the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle be adopted for uses of this technology, while a major cross‑disciplinary effort is generated to train researchers in bioelectromagnetics and provide monitoring of potential health impacts of RF‑EMF.

Summary of conclusions:

(1) Public exposure to millimeter waves, in the sub-Terahertz frequency range, is currently less common. If these devices fill the public space they will affect everyone, including the more susceptible members of the public: babies, pregnant women, the elderly, the sick and electro hypersensitive individuals.

(2) Human sweat ducts transmit and perhaps also receive electromagnetic waves that reflect the person’s emotional state, as an extension of the sympathetic nervous system that innervates sweat ducts

(3) These newly suggested physiologic and psychological functions of human sweat ducts have not yet been researched by neurophysiologists or by psychologists

(4) Computer simulations have demonstrated that sweat glands concentrate sub-terahertz waves in human skin. Humans could sense these waves as heat. The use of sub-terahertz (Millimeter wave) communications technology (cellphones, Wi Fi, antennas) could cause humans to percept physical pain via nociceptors.

(5) Potentially, if G5 WI FI is spread in the public domain we may expect more of the health effects currently seen with RF/ microwave frequencies including many more cases of hypersensitivity (EHS), as well as many new complaints of physical pain and a yet unknown variety of neurologic disturbances.

(6) It will be possible to show a causal relationship between G5 technology and these specific health effects. The affected individuals may be eligible for compensation.

Respected members of the FCC and U.S. Senate Committees,

Please protect Public Health and vote against exposure of the public to harmful G5 technology.

Respectfully,

Dr. Yael Stein MD

https://ehtrust.org/letter-fcc-dr-yael-stein-md-opposition-5g-spectrum-frontiers/

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## Leszczynski, speaker at 2017 5G Iceland conference

The take-away message from the Science and Wireless 2016:

• RF-EMF exposures affect beta-amyloid proteins in brains of transgenic mice
• Effect on beta-amyloid protein is caused by non-thermal mechanism
• It is still unclear whether observed beneficial effects of RF-EMF in transgenic mice will apply to human AD
• ICNIRP stubbornly disregards all evidence concerning non-thermal effects of RF-EMF (ICNIRP’s acceptance of the existence of non-thermal effects would invalidate current safety limits)
• ICNIRP, arbitrarily, without plausible scientific evidence, places skin among the less important parts of body that can be more exposed to RF-EMF
• Skin should not be allowed to be placed by ICNIRP in the ‘limbs’ group of organs because this will allow the 5G technology to market devices with higher radiation exposure, irrespective of the proximity of these devices to human body – all energy of 5G device will be absorbed solely by the skin
• Implementation of 5G technology goes fast ahead in spite of the complete lack of science on the 5G effects on skin biology
• The Precautionary Principle is completely disregarded by the ICNIRP and industry

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## SOME BIO-EFFECTS FOUND IN STUDIES

Inflammation, oxidative stress

Alteration in water properties

Alteration of plasma dielectric permittivity

Alteration of plasma absorption coefficient

Anomalous temperature changes

Variable microbe growth rate changes

Disturbed protozoan growth control mechanisms

Altered chromosome function, structure, repair

Altered membrane channel function, excitability

Altered membrane antibiotic sensitivity

Altered cell metabolic activities

Specific peripheral receptor responses

Changes in embryonic survival

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## from Stand Alone Antenna Poles

Testimony by Dr. Anthony Miller

Toronto City Hall,  Toronto Ontario  – July 30 2016

## Ramazzini Institute Study on Base Station Radiofrequency Radiation: Teleconference March 22, 2018

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

A recent study warns that milliwave radiation likely will be more dangerous to insects, including bees.  Radiation absorption depends upon size. The milliwaves are very short and are more readily absorbed by insects, which would be dangerous to their health and vitality and, consequently, to our food supply and well-being.

## Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz

“They (the insects) show a general increase in absorbed radio-frequency power above 6 GHz (until the frequencies where the wavelengths are comparable to their body size), which indicates that if the used power densities do not decrease, but shift (partly) to higher frequencies, the absorption in the studied insects will increase as well.

A shift of 10% of the incident power density to frequencies above 6 GHz would lead to an increase in absorbed power between 3–370%. This could lead to changes in insect behaviour, physiology, and morphology over time due to an increase in body temperatures, from dielectric heating.”

## https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22271-3

From top to bottom: Real part of the used dielectric permittivity, Imaginary part of the used dielectric permittivity, and conductivity with RF-EMF penetration depth as an inset. Markers show measurements obtained from literature. The black line with circular markers shows the average over the available data series at those frequencies.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

## 5G Health concerns : Physicians for Safe Technology

https://mdsafetech.org/problems/5g/

## The Answer or a Predictable Dilemma?

The telecommunications industry is actively promoting and marketing  5G (or 5th generation) Technology and the Internet of Things. They promise that it will bring enhanced communications, jobs, and an economic boost to our cities. Many argue that there are health, safety, environmental, privacy, security and energy use issues, however, that have not been addressed. Far from being mobile, this technology will depend on thousands of  fixed “small cell” antennae throughout cities and residential neighborhoods, about 300 meters (100 feet) apart. In order to function, these short wavelength radiofrquencies (10-100 Gigahertz or GHz) will be pulsing at billions of times a second will be on 24 hours a day.

### 5G Signals the Skin Through Sweat Glands

Although they only penetrate the outer layers of skin, elements in the skin can act as a mini antennas radiating the EMR deeper into the body and signaling the nervous, endocrine and immune system with broad adverse effects. There has been no pre market testing of 5G. It is assumed safe if it does not burn the skin. Like prior 2G,3G and 4G networks, they are considered dangerous only if they heat the body. FCC guidelines are only based on heat. There has been no consideration for adverse  biological effects found at non thermal levels in a multitude of studies.

### 5G Wireless Versus Fiberoptic to the Home

There is growing concern, despite industry ads,  that 5G is overrated and that the expense will not match profit margin. There is also closer scrutiny of the 5G rollout with the knowledge that underground fiberoptic networks are much more reliable than wireless networks in a fire or for emergencies.  Utility poles overloaded with cell antenna equipment from multiple carriers were responsible for fires in Malibu in 2007, costing about \$100 million in fines. This is a more common occurrence with severe weather changes and aging poles.  Advantages of Fiberoptic to the premises (FTTP) are

• Fiberoptic networks are much less susceptible to congestion due to each household having a dedicated link
• Underground FTTP are less susceptible to damage from fires which are becoming more frequent.
• Fiberoptic To The Premises (FTTP) is not subject to terrain variability, such as trees and hills, thus is the best and most equitable method for delivery of broadband internet.
• Fiberoptic has faster speed, less energy use and more privacy and security than with wireless systems
• Fiberoptic does not emit harmful radio frequency radiation, which has been shown to harm humans,
• Open Access Fiberoptic systems are a win-win for industry and cities.

## 5G Moratorium Called for by Scientists Due to Human and Environmental Threats

### 5G: International Society of Doctors Environmental Appeal 2018

The International Society of Doctors for the Environment states in their appeal for a moratorium on  5G “We believe it should be unethical to ignore the available evidence waiting a possible “a posteriori” demonstration of health damages in the presence of a present and potentially manageable risk for public health…..Thus, in the respect of the precautionary principle and of the WHO principle “health in all policies”, we believe suitable the request of a standstill for the “5G experimentations” throughout Europe until an adequate and active involvement of public institutions operating in the field of environmental health (health ministry, environmental ministry, national environmental and health agencies) will be effectively planned.”

### International 5G Appeal: Scientists and Doctors Warn of Potential Serious Health Effects

We the undersigned scientists and doctors recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.  5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”        5G Appeal

### 5G Information Fact Sheets for Printing

Environmental Health Trust has created information sheets on 5G and Small Cells  that have valuable information and can be shared with policy makers, community leaders and others.

SaferEMR also has information on 5G –SaferEMR 5G Moratorium and Appeal

US Factsheet on 5G and Small Cells in Color With Hyperlinks

US Factsheet on 5G and Small Cells in Black and White For Printing

International Factsheet on 5G and Small Cells in Color With Hyperlinks

International Factsheet on 5G and Small Cells in Black and White

Scientist-Appeal-5G-Moratorium

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

# used in XRAYS

·         The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) claims their “advanced imaging technology” devices are just as safe as traditional metal detectors. Research shows this isn’t the case and that the doses of electromagnetic radiation emitted by the TSA’s millimeter wave technology machines can cause cancer.

·         Millimeter wave technology is used in the treatment of skin cancer (due to its known skin-heating properties), which means it undeniably has an effect on human cells.

·         Like all other forms of radiation, millimeter waves don’t differentiate between healthy cells and malignant cells. In the case of concentrated radiation blasts from millimeter wave body scanners, it means every cell on the surface of your body is targeted.

·         A World Health Organization (WHO) report revealed that millimeter waves not only heat the skin but also damage eyesight and cause cancer − particularly skin cancer.

·         By choosing a manual pat-down, air travelers can minimize their radiation exposure and thus minimize the risk of developing cancer.

## Los Alamos Study Finds Airport Scanners Alter DNA

/ by

http://www.trinfinity8.com/tag/tsa-cancer-rates/

## Did Airport Scanners Give Boston TSA Agents Cancer?

Claim: TSA employees now developing cancer clusters from standing near body scanner machines

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) In a new twist to the TSA saga to which we can only say, “We told ya so,” the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has obtained documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that reveal TSA employees are reporting “cancer clusters” among their own employees who work near radiation body scanners. At the same time, DHS refuses to issue dosimeters to TSA employees because, obviously, those dosimeters would indicate alarming levels of radiation exposure. So it’s better to just keep everyone ignorant and keep irradiating all the TSA employees and hope nobody notices, apparently.

That TSA employees are giving themselves cancer by irradiating innocent travelersis perhaps the most striking bit of tragic justice we’ve yet seen in this entire fiasco. TSA agents commit felony crimes every single day against innocent travelers, molesting them, illegally detaining them and humiliating them as part of the “security screening” procedures. They’re also irradiating them with the naked body scanners that we all know Janet Napolitano openly lied about (http://www.naturalnews.com/032839_body_scann…). As a side effect of that irradiation effort, TSA employees are also irradiating themselves. Cancer, not surprisingly, will not be far behind.

By the way, the best and most timely reporting on this subject is currently coming from Paul Joseph Watson at PrisonPlanet.com, who, together with Alex Jones leading the protests, has been hammering both the TSA and the Texas legislature over these criminal pat-downs (http://www.prisonplanet.com/cancer-surges-in…). In an age where nearly all mainstream journalism is little more than comedic shilling for Big Government, it’s refreshing to know that people like Watson are still pursuing the role of honest journalismthat questions government’s lies (as in the Nixon era).

Napolitano lied about safety of body scanners Why are the body scanners causing cancer clusters among TSA employees? As we reported yesterday, Janet Napolitano lied about the safety of the devices, claiming that NIST had “affirmed the safety” of them. NIST fired back an email that specifically explained NIST doesn’t test the safety of products at all! Ever! Therefore, all the claims that these devices were tested and confirmed as safe was complete B.S. from Napolitano. Just an outright lie. Not a shred of truth to be found.

You see, when government has abandoned the truth as a matter of policy, it can only resort to lies to further its agenda. The truth no longer has any place in the U.S. government, where criminals and thugs simply make up whatever lies they want and then pass them off as “truth” to the press (which dutifully reports all government lies as truths). This is precisely the case with the TSA and these naked body scanners. It’s also the situation with the economy, the unemployment rate and the national debt, if you follow economic news. The American empire has become what the Roman Empire was right before its fall: A tragic cabal of professional thieves and liars who run the government and steal from the People.

TSA employees fry their own genitals with radiation Now, even though the NIST did not test the safety of these machines, it did warn airport screeners to avoid standing next to them because the machines clearly emitted doses of radiation that could mutate DNA and cause cancer.

The bulk of TSA employees, who we’ve already established are among the most intellectually-challenged individuals which are still somehow employable, don’t seem to care that they’re getting fried with radiation every day on the job. In fact, many TSA employees don’t even understand the laws of physics, as has been demonstrated over and over when they tell travelers truly idiotic things like, “There’s no radiation from these machines.” (True story. This is what one of our contributing writers was told by a TSA agent in Denver.)

Gee, how do they think the machines work? Do they think they’re magic? Who needs radiation when you can just use magic to see through people!

The one notable upshot from all this is the realization that TSA agents might experience so much DNA damage from standing next to those machines that they will be rendered completely infertile and therefore have no ability to reproduce. This, the scientists say, is called “natural selection.” Those best adapted to surviving will pass on their genes to the next generation, while those who fail to protect the integrity of their own DNA get removed from the human gene pool. I can’t think of a more appropriate example of natural selection in action. Darwin eats TSA agents as a mid-morning snack, it seems. So maybe those radiation machines do have a purpose after all…

All kidding aside, there’s a kind of poetic justice in the idea that these agents who terrorize innocents will one day find themselves on the receiving end of a chemotherapy drip. It’s not that we wish suffering upon anyone, but this is a suffering they have brought upon themselves. At what point, I wonder, will the cancer-stricken TSA employees finally figure out the government is lying to THEM, too?

That’s a realization shared by many veterans who sign up for military service with all sorts of patriotic enthusiasm and then one day realize the government has stolen their health benefits and abandoned their needs. Such is the result of naive faith in a government that couldn’t care less about the people it claims to serve. Well, heck, I’m not even sure the government continues that “serving the people” cover story anymore. Now, the government openly claims to be the supreme power over the servant people.

Learn more at EPIC You can read up on the FOIA documents, the cover-ups, the lies and more at the EPIC website: http://epic.org/privacy/airtravel/backscatte…

There, you’ll find details about the lawsuit, supporting legal documents and more. Thank goodness we have EPIC, huh? I encourage you to consider making a donation to this outstanding non-profit group. They consistently produce important victories in the fight to defend your privacy and freedoms.

This is not a time to stay silent. Unless, for some reason, you just enjoy having your reproductive organs irradiated by a body scanning machine that’s probably giving the TSA’s own employees cancer right this minute.

http://www.naturalnews.com/032841_body_scanners_cancer.html

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

# used in ACTIVE DENIAL / DIRECTED ENERGY

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System

## Los Alamos Study Finds Airport Scanners Alter DNA

/ by

http://www.trinfinity8.com/tag/tsa-cancer-rates/

<< The military’s Active Denial weapon uses millimeter wave technology to create an intense burning sensation on the skin’s surface using a 95 GHz (3.2mm wavelength) beam. But the TSA tells us not to worry about their millimeter waves because, “Millimeter wave technology bounces harmless electromagnetic waves off the body to create the same generic image for all passengers.”  This is completely inaccurate because the nature of millimeter waves is that our bodies and water are excellent absorbers of these waves. Millimeter waves do penetrate and absorb into our skin.

At the microwave technology center in Malaysia, health subjects were exposed to microwave radiation between 20 — 38 GHz, the range in which the TSA scanners operate. They found that millimeter waves penetrated the subject’s skin at depths of between 1.05 mm at 20 GHz to 0.78 mm at 38 GHz. This is enough to penetrate below the epidermal layer of the skin.

Millimeter waves have been reported to produce a variety of bioeffects, many of which are quite unexpected from radiation penetrated less than 1 mm into biological tissues. Of particular concern is the citing of studies that show there is an irreversible water memory effect by millimeter waves operating in the 36GHz frequency, and that the millimeter wave effects on blood plasma vary greatly from one person to the next.  >>

 IEEE Radar bands Letter Designation Frequency range X band 8 to 12 GHz Ku band 12 to 18 GHz K band 18 to 26.5 GHz Ka band 26.5 to 40 GHz Q band 33 to 50 GHz U band 40 to 60 GHz V band 50 to 75 GHz E band 60 to 90 GHz W band 75 to 110 GHz F band 90 to 140 GHz D band 110 to 170 GHz G band 140 to 220 GHz

Frequency Band
10 kHz to 30 kHz Very Low Frequency (VLF)
30 kHz to 300 kHz Low Frequency (LF)
300 kHz to 3 MHz Medium Frequency (MF)
3 MHz to 30 MHz High Frequency (HF)
30 MHz to 328.6 MHz Very High Frequency (VHF)
328.6 MHz to 450 MHz
450 MHz to 470 MHz
470 MHz to 806 MHz
806 MHz to 960 MHz
960 MHz to 2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz to 2.9 GHz
Ultra High Frequency (UHF)
2.9 GHz to 30 GHz Super High Frequency (SHF)
30 GHz and above Extremely High Frequency (EHF)

## Websites : 5G Health Effects

http://whatis5g.info/health/2017/09/millimeter-wave-frequency-studies-and-reviews/

## Barrie Trower “5G Will Devastate Humanity but Those Behind it Are Above the Law!”

Published on Feb 1, 2018

## Scientists warn of potential serious health effects of 5G

September 11, 2017

PDF ENITRE DOCUMENT  : Scientist-Appeal-for-5G-Moratorium-September-11-2017

We the undersigned, more than 170 scientists from 37 countries, recommend a moratorium on the roll- out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place.  RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.

## 5G leads to massive increase of mandatory exposure to wireless radiation

5G technology is effective only over short distance. It is poorly transmitted through solid material.

Many new antennas will be required and full-scale implementation will result in antennas in urban areas, thus massively increasing mandatory exposure.

With ”the ever more extensive use of wireless technologies,” nobody can avoid to be exposed. Because on top of the increased number of 5G-transmitters (even within housing, shops and in hospitals) according to estimates, ”10 to 20 billion connections” (to refrigerators, washing machines, surveillance cameras, self-driving cars and buses, etc.) will be parts of the Internet of Things. All these together can cause a substantial increase in the total, long term RF-EMF exposure to all EU citizens.

## Harmful effects of RF-EMF exposure are already proven

Over 220 scientists from more than 40 countries have expressed their “serious concerns” regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices already before the additional 5G roll-out. They refer to the fact that ”numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals.

After the scientists’ appeal was written in 2015 additional research has convincingly confirmed serious health risks from RF-EMF fields from wireless technology. The world’s largest study (25 million US dollar) National Toxicology Program (NTP), shows statistically significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF below the ICNIRP guidelines followed by most countries. These results support results in human epidemiological studies on RF radiation and brain tumour risk. A large number of peer-reviewed scientific reports demonstrate harm to human health from EMFs. Radiation Protection)

RF-EMF radiation is carcinogenic to humans.

(International Commission on Non-Ionizing confirm that The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2011 concluded that EMFs of frequencies 30 KHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). However, new studies like the NTP study mentioned above and several epidemiological investigations including the latest studies on mobile phone use and brain cancer risks

The EUROPA EM-EMF Guideline 2016 states that ”there is strong evidence that long-term exposure to certain EMFs is a risk factor for diseases such as certain cancers, Alzheimer’s disease, and male infertili- ty…Common EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) symptoms include headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, lack of energy, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms.”

An increasing part of the European population is affected by ill health symptoms that have for many years been linked to exposure to EMF and wireless radiation in the scientific literature. The Interna- tional Scientific Declaration on EHS & multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), Brussels 2015, declares that: “In view of our present scientific knowledge, we thereby stress all national and international bodies and insti- tutions…to recognize EHS and MCS as true medical conditions which acting as sentinel diseases may create a major public health concern in years to come worldwide i.e. in all the countries implementing unrestricted use of electromagnetic field-based wireless technologies and marketed chemical substances… Inaction is a cost to society and is not an option anymore… we unanimously acknowledge this serious hazard to public health…that major primary prevention measures are adopted and prioritized, to face this worldwide panepidemic in perspective.”

## Precautions

The Precautionary Principle adopted by EU 2005 diminish that harm.” actions shall be taken to avoid or The (UNESCO) was : ”When human activities may lead to morally unacceptable harm that is scientifically plausible but uncertain,

Resolution 1815 (Council of Europe, 2011): ”Take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radio frequencies from mobile phones, and particularly the exposure to children and young people who seem to be most at risk from head tumours…Assembly strongly recom- mends that the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle is applied, covering both the so-called thermal effects and the athermic [non-thermal] or biological effects of electromagnetic emissions or radiation” and to ”improve risk-assessment standards and quality”.

The Nuremberg code (1949) applies to all experiments on humans, thus including the roll-out of 5G with new, higher RF-EMF exposure. All such experiments: ”should be based on previous knowledge (e.g., an expectation derived from animal experiments) that justifies the experiment.

No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.”

The European Environment Agency “Safety guidelines” protect industry — not health The current ICNIRP ”safety guidelines” tionships with telecommunications or electric companies to include scientists with competence in medicine

No experiment should be con- haps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. expectation derived from animal experiments) that justifies the experiment.

The European Environment Agency (EEA) is warning for “Radiation risk from everyday devices” in spite of the radiation being below the WHO/ICNIRP standards.  EEA also concludes : “There are many examples of the failure to use the precautionary principle in the past, which have resulted in serious and often irreversible damage to health and environments… harmful exposures can be widespread before there is both ‘convincing’ evidence of harm from long-term exposures, and biological understanding (mechanism) of how that harm is caused.”

## “Safety guidelines” protect industry — not health

The current ICNIRP/WHO guidelines for EMF are based on the obsolete hypothesis heating of exposed tissue that ”The critical effect of RF-EMF exposure relevant to human health and safety is heating of exposed tissue.” However, scientists have proven that many different kinds of illnesses and harms are caused without heating  (”non- thermal effect”) at radiation levels well below ICNIRP guidelines.

## We urge EU:

1) To take all reasonable measures to halt the 5G RF-EMF expansion until independent scientists can assure that 5G and the total radiation levels caused by RF-EMF (5G together with 2G, 3G, 4G, and WiFi) will not be harmful for EU-citizens, especially infants, children and pregnant women, as well as the environment.

2) To recommend that all EU countries, especially their radiation safety agencies, follow Resolution 1815 and information, citizens, including, teachers and physicians,

how and why to avoid wireless communication, particularly in/near e.g., daycare centres, schools, homes, workplaces, hospitals and elderly care.

3) To appoint immediately, without industry influence, an EU task force of independent, truth Impartial EMF-and-health scientists with no conflicts of interest to re-evaluate the health risks and :

a) to decide about new, safe “maximum total exposure standards” for all wireless communication within EU.  b) To study the total and cumulative exposure affecting EU-citizens.  c)  To create rules that will be prescribed/enfoced within the EU about how to avoid exposure exceeding new EU”maximum total exposure standards” concerning all kinds of EMFs in order to protect citizens.  especially infants.  children and pregnant woman.

4) To prevent the wireless/telecom industry through its lobbying organizations from persuading EU officials to make decisions about further propagation of RF radiation including 5G in Europe.

5) To favor and implement wired digital telecommunication instead of wireless.

Respectfully submitted,
Rainer Nyberg, EdD, Professor Emeritus (Åbo Akademi), Vasa, Finland ([email protected])

3) To appoint immediately, without industry influence, an EU task force of independent, truly impartial EMF-and-health scientists with no conflicts of interest1 to re-evaluate the health risks and:

a) To decide about new, safe “maximum total exposure standards” for all wireless communication within EU.

b) To study the total and cumulative exposure affecting EU-citizens.

c) To create rules that will be prescribed/enforced within the EU about how to avoid expo- sure exceeding new EU ”maximum total exposure standards” concerning all kinds of EMFs in order to protect citizens, especially infants, children and pregnant women.

We expect an answer from you no later than October 31, 2017 to the two first mentioned signatories about what measures you will take to protect the EU-inhabitants against RF-EMF and especially 5G radiation. This appeal and your response will be publicly available.

Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Professor (assoc) Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden (

1 Avoid similar mistakes as when the Commission (2008/721/EC) appointed industry supportive members for SCE- NIHR, who submitted to EU a misleading SCENIHR report on health risks, giving telecom industry a clean bill to irradiate EU citizens. The report is now quoted by radiation safety agencies in EU.

## Signatories to Scientists’ 5G Appeal

(As of September 8, 2017)

Note: The endorsements are personal and not necessarily supported by the affiliated universities or organizations.

EU and European Nations

BELGIUM

Marie-Claire Cammaerts, Dr, retired, Free University of Brussels, Bruxelles BULGARIA

Marko Markov, Professor Emeritus, Ph.D. in biophysics, Sofia University, Research international

CYPRUS

Stella Canna Michaelidou, Dr, Chemist Expert on Environment, Health and Food Safety, President of the Cyprus National Committee on Environment and Children’s Health

FINLAND

Marjukka Hagström, LL.M, M.Soc.Sc., Senior researcher, The Finnish Electrosensitivity Foundation, Turku

Osmo Hänninen, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Physiology), Kuopio
Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, DSc, Adjunct Professor of Biochemistry, University of Helsinki Georgiy Ostroumov, PhD (in the field of RF EMF), independent researcher

Dominique Belpomme, MD, MSc, Full Professor in Medical Oncology; Director of ECERI, Paris University, Paris & European Cancer and Environment Research Institute, Brussels

Philippe Irigaray, PhD, Scientific Director, Association for Research on Treatment against Cancer (ARTAC), Paris; European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (ECERI), Brussels

AUSTRIA

Gerd Oberfeld, MD, Public Health Officer, Salzburg

FRANCE

Marc Arazi, MD, Physician (Whistleblower on Phonegate international scandal), Nogent-sur-Marne

Vincent Lauer, Ing. ECP, Independent Researcher, La Chapelle sur Erdre
Annie J Sasco, MD, DrPH, Former Director of Research, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Former Chief of Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention at the

ternational Agency for Research on Cancer and Former Acting Chief of Program for Control, World Health Organization, Bordeaux

GERMANY

In- Cancer

Franz Adlkofer, MD, Professor, Pandora-Foundation for Independent Research
Christine Aschermann, MD (retired) member of the Kompetenzinitiative e.V., Leutkirch
Mario Babilon, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University Stuttgart
Wolf Bergmann, Dr. med., Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie

e.V., Freiburg

Rainer Frentzel-Beyme, MD, Professor emeritus, University of Bremen.
Helmut Breunig, Diploma degree in forestry, Specialty: Radio frequency injuries on trees around phone

masts, Osterode am Harz
Klaus Buchner, Dr. rer. nat., Professor, MEP – Member of the European Parliament,

Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., München

Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 4

Horst Eger, Dr. med., Ärztlicher Qualitätszirkel ”Elektromagnetische Felder in der Medizin – Diagnostik, Therapie, Umwelt”, Naila

Karl Hecht, Dr, Professor of pathophysiology and neurophysiology (Emeritus of the Medical center Charite), Berlin

Peter Hensinger , MA, diagnose:funk, consumer protection organisation, Stuttgart
Markus Kern, Dr. med., Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie

e.V., Kempten
Florian M. König, Dr.Sc. Man. Dir. & Science Header of the Company/Institute “Florian König

Enterprises GmbH”
Andrea Leute, Dr. med., Ärzteinitiative Mobilfunk Allgäu-Bodensee-Oberschwaben, Überlingen Martin Lion, Dr. med., Allgemeinmedizin – Homöopathie, Ulm
Peter Ludwig, Dr. phil., Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie

e.V., Saarbrücken
Willi Mast, Dr., Arzt für Allgemeinmedizin und Innere Medizin, Gelsenkirchen
Joachim Mutter, Dr. med., Paracelsus Clinic / Switzerland, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von

Mensch, Umwelt und Demokratie e.V., Murg
Peter Ohnsorge, Dr. med., European Academy for Environmental Medicine
Karl Richter, Dr. phil., Professor, Kompetenzinitiative zum Schutz von Mensch, Umwelt und

Demokratie e.V., St. Ingbert
Claus Scheingraber, Dr. med. dent., German Working Group Electro-Biology, Brunnthal, Cornelia Waldmann-Selsam, Dr.med., Competence Initiative for the Protection of Humanity,

Environment and Democracy e.V., Bamberg
Werner Thiede, Dr. theol., Professor, Pfarrer der Evangelisch-Lutherischen Landeskirche in

Bayern und Publizist, Neuhausen
Helmut Wagner, Dr. med., Ophthalmologist, Stuttgart
Harald Walach, Professor, PhD in psychology, PhD in theory and history of science, Change Health Science

Institute, Berlin; affiliation: Witten-Herdecke University, Poznan Medical University, Poland Ulrich Warnke, Dr.rer.nat., Academic Superior Council (retired) University of Saarland
Isabel Wilke, Diplom-Biologin, Editor ElektrosmogReport, Kassel/Berlin
Roland Wolff, Dipl.-Phys., Medical Physicist, Bremen
Ortwin Zais, PhD (Dr. med.), European Academy for Environmental Medicine

GREECE

Christos Georgiou, PhD, Member, Scientific Secretariat of ICEMS; Professor of Biochemistry, Biology De- partment, University of Patras, Patras

Theodore P. Metsis, PhD, Electrical, Mechanical, Environmental Engineer, Consultant, Athens

ITALY

Fernanda Amicarelli, Full Professor in Applied Biology, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila

Fiorella Belpoggi, Dr., Director, Research Department, Ramazzini Institute, Bologna
Sergio Bernasconi, Full Professor of Pediatrics, former Director, Pediatric Department, Editor

emeritus: Italian Journal of Pediatrics, University of Parma
Dr Franco Berrino, MD, PhD, former Director, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Istituton-

azionale dei Tumori, Milan
Ernesto Burgio, MD, Pediatrician, ECERI – European Cancer and Environment Research Institute (Bruxelles) Dott. Agostino Di Ciaula, President of Scientific Committee, Italian Society of Doctors for the

Environment – ISDE Italy, Arezzo
Dott. Andrea Cormano, MD, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Benevento Dr Patrizia Difonte, Physician, Surgeon, General practitioner and occupational medicine,

Associazione Italiana Elettrosensibili, Lonate Pozzolo (Varese)

Stefano Falone, PhD, Researcher, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, Section of Biolog- ical and Biotechnological Sciences University of L’Aquila’,(AQ),

Dr. Mario Frusi, MD, medico, Cuneo

Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 5

Dr. Stefano Gallozzi, Astrophysician and technologist at the INAF Italian National Astrophysical Institute in

the Observatory, President of the Comitato di Tutela e Salvaguardia dell’Ambiente in Monte Porzio

Catone (ONLUS association), Rome

Dott. Roberto Gava, Pharmacologist and Toxicologist, ISDE, Padua
Valerio Gennaro, MD, PhD, Head ,Liguria Mesothelioma Registry (COR Liguria), UO Clinical Epidemiology

(IST Nord – CBA); IRCCS Policlinico Ospedale San Martino National Cancer Research Institute (IST),

Genoa
Livio Giuliani, PhD, Professor, Università dell’Abruzzo – Corso di Laurea in Fisiatria, Chieti

Salvatore Magazù,PhD, Full Professor of Experimental Physics, Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche e Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra, Università di Messina

Fiorenzo Marinelli, PhD, Institute of Molecular Genetics (IGM), National Research Council (CNR), Member of the International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety (ICEMS), Bologna,
Dott. Carlo Ratti, MD, Ordine dei Medici della SPEZIA, Genova
Ruggero Ridolfi, MD, Oncologist Endocrinologist, ISDE, Forlì-Cesena,

Massimo Melelli Roia, MD, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Perugia Dott. Roberto Romizi, President, Italian Society of Doctors for the Environment – ISDE, Arezzo Dott.ssa Ida Santellocco, MD, Medico chirurgo, Pediatria, medico chirurgo – pediatra, Roma Massimo Scalia, Coordinator of the Bioelectromagnetism Section of CIRPS (Interuniversity

Research Center for Sustainable Development)
Franco Verzella, MD, physician, practice dedicated to autistic children, Bologna,
Myriam Zucca, Dr. ssa, Medical Director, Dermatology, Cagliari University Hospital, Sardinia

MALTA

Pierre Mallia, MD PhD CBiol MPhil MA(Law) DipICGP MMCFD MRCP FRCGP, Professor of Family Medicine, Bioethics & Patients’ Rights; Chairperson National Health Ethics Committee, Dept. of Health; Chairperson Bioethics Consultative Committee, Ministry of Health; Coordinator Bioethics Research Programme, Univ. of Malta; President, Malta College of Angelo Levis, PhD. Professor, Biologist, University of Padua

Roberto Lucchini, MD, Professor of Occupational Medicine, University of Brescia

NETHERLANDS

PORTUGAL

SLOVAKIA

Family Doctors

Hugo Schooneveld, PhD, Retired Associate professor (Wageningen Agricultural University),

Advisor to the Dutch EHS Foundation, former president of ‘Stichting elektro-

hypersensitivity’, Wageningen

Paulo Vale, PhD, Auxiliary Researcher, Sea and Marine Resources Department, The Portuguese Sea and

Atmosphere Institute, Lisbon

Igor Belyaev, PhD, Dr.Sc, Associate Professor, Cancer Research Institute, BMC SAS, Bratislava
Jan Jakus, MD, PhD, DSc., Professor, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin Ladislav Janousek, PhD, Professor, Department of Electromagnetic and Biomedical Engineering

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Zilina, Žilina
Michal Teplan, PhD, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak academy of sciences, Bratislava

SPAIN

Alfonso Balmori, BSc, Master in Environmental Education, Biologist. Junta de Castilla y León, Valladolid

José Luis Bardasano, PhD, Biologist and Physician, Prof. of Medical Bioelectomagnetism, Depart-

ment of Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Alcalá. Alcalá de

Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 6

Miguel Lopez-Lazaro, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville

María Elena López Martín, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Human Anatomy, School of Medicine, Universi- ty of Santiago de Compostela (USC)

Enrique A. Navarro, PhD, Professor, University of Valencia, Valencia
Claudio Gómez-Perretta, MD, PhD, Chief of Section, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia
Ceferino Maestu Unturbe, Ph.D, Prof., Director of the Bioelectromagnetism Laboratory of the Centre for

Biomedical Technology (CTB), Polytechnic University of Madrid (UPM).

SWEDEN

Mikko Ahonen, PhD, researcher, Sundsvall Michael Carlberg, MSc,

Mikael Eriksson, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, Skane University Hospital, Lund Lena Hedendahl, MD, Independent Environment and Health Research, Luleå

Gunilla Ladberg, PhD, Member of the Board of the Swedish association Vågbrytaren, Lidingö
Elsy-Britt Schildt, MD, PhD, Senior Consultant, Department of Oncology and Radiation, County Hospital,

Kalmar

SWITZERLAND

Daniel Favre, Dr. phil., Biologist, Independent Researcher, Brent
Peter Meier, Dr.Med., Facharzt für Innere Medizin FMH, M.Sc. Präventivmedizin, Mitglied der European

UK

Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD, BMBS, Founder of PHIRE (Physicians’ Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment) Trustee Radiation Research Trust, Medical Advisor ORSAA (Oceana

David Gee, Visiting Fellow, Institute of Environment, Health and Societies, Brunel University, London

Andrew Goldsworthy, BSc, PhD, Lecturer in Biology (retired), Imperial College London, Monmouth
Alasdair Philips, BSc, DAgE, Professional engineer, Powerwatch
Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, MBBS, MA, MSc, PhD , Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Department of Occupa-

tional Health, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Trust; Honorary Research Fellow, Department of Clinical

Sciences, Brunel University, London
Sarah Starkey, PhD, Independent Neuroscience and Environmental Health Research

Other Nations

ARMENIA

Sinerik Ayrapetyan, PhD, Professor, Life Sciences International Postgraduate Educational Center, UNESCO Chair in Life Sciences, Yerevan, Head of Research Council and Chairholder of UNESCO Chair

AUSTRALIA

Priyanka Bandara, PhD, Environmental Health Consultant, Castle Hill/Sydney, NSW
Katherine Georgouras, OAM, DDM, FACD, Professor of Dermatology, (semiretired) ,Kenthurst NSW
Ray Kearney OAM, PhD, Honorary Assoc. Professor (retired), Department of Medicine, University of Sydney Don Maisch, PhD, Independent researcher, author of ”The Procrustean Approach”, Lindisfarne,

Tasmania
May Murray, PhD, Independent Environmental Health researcher, Canberra

Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University

Hospital, Örebro

Olle Johansson, Associate Professor, Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolin-

ska Institute, Stockholm

Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 7

Elena Pirogova, PhD, Associate Professor, Biomed Eng, BEng (Hons) Chem En, Discipline of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University

Charles Teo, AM, MBBS, Professor, Neurosurgeon, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Syd- ney

Steve Weller, BSc, Founding member of ORSSA, Brisbane

BRAZIL

Orlando Furtado Vieira Filho, PhD, Professor, Cellular & Molecular Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Claudio Enrique Fernández-Rodríguez, PhD, MSEE, Professor, Federal Institute of Rio Grande do Sul, IFRS, Canoas
Alvaro Augusto A. de Salles, PhD, Full Professor, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Porto

Alegre
Francisco de Assis Ferreira Tejo (retired) D.Sc., Professor, Grupo de Eletromagnetismo Computacional e

Bioeletromagnetismo, Electrical Engineering Dept, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Frank Clegg, CEO, Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST); Former President of Microsoft Canada
Paul Héroux, PhD, Occupational Health Program Director, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatis- tics and Occupational Health, McGill University Medicine, Montreal, PQ
Anthony B. Miller, MD, FRCP, Professor Emeritus, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Malcolm Paterson, PhD, Director, Research Initiatives, BC Cancer Agency Sindi Ahluwalia

Hawkins Centre for the Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC
Michael A. Persinger, PhD, Professor, Biomolecular Sciences, Behavioural Neuroscience and Human Studies,

Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario

CHINA

Wenjun Sun, PhD, Professor, Bioelectromagnetics Key Laboratory, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou

Minglian Wang, M.M. , PhD, Associate Professor, College of Life Science & Bioengineering, Beijing Universi- ty of Technology (BJUT), Beijing

COLOMBIA

Carlos Sosa, MD, University of Antioquia, Medellín EGYPT

Nasr Radwan, Prof. Dr., Cairo University, Faculty of Science, Cairo INDIA

R. S. Sharma, PhD, Head, Scientist – G & Sr. DDG, Div. of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health and Chief Project Coordinator – EMF Health Project India, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansa- ri Nagar, New Delhi

IRAN

Amirnader Emami Razavi, PhD, Executive Manager and Principal Investigator of Iran, National Tumor Bank, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Dr. Masood Sepehrimanesh, PhD, Assistant Professor, Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center, Guilan Universtiy of Medical Sciences, Rasht

ISRAEL

Iris Atzmon, MPH, Epidemiology, University of Haifa, Author of ”The Cellular, not what you thought!”, Haifa

Sareesh Naduvil Narayanan, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, RAK College of Medical

Sciences, RAK Medical & Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE

Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 8

Michael Peleg, M.Sc., Radio Communications Engineer and Researcher, Technion, Israel Institute of Tech- nology, Haifa

Elihu D Richter, MD MPH, Professor, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Jerusalem

Yael Stein, MD, Hebrew University – Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem Danny Wolf, MD, Pediatrician, Clialit Health Services Raziel, Netanya Herzelia

JAPAN

Hidetake Miyata, PhD, Associate professor, Department of Physics. Tohoku University

JORDAN

Mohammed Saleh Al Salameh, PhD, Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Science & Technology, Irbid

KOREA (South)

Kiwon Song, PhD, Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul
Young Hwan Ahn, MD PhD, Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou Univeristy School of

Medicine, Suwon

NEW ZEALAND

Mary Redmayne, PhD, Adjunct Research Fellow, Victoria University of Wellington
Damian Wojcik, MD, MBChB, Medical director/ Northland Environmental health Clinic, Whangare,

Northland

NIGERIA

Aneyo Idowu Ayisat, M.Sc., Lecturer, Environmental Biology Unit, Biological Science Department, Yaba College of Technology, Yaba, Lagos

OMAN

Dr Najam Siddiqi, MBBS, PhD, Associate Professor of Anatomy, Oman Medical College, Sohar RUSSIAN FEDERATION

Yury Grigoriev, Professor, M. Dr Sci., Federal. Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow Maxim V. Trushin, PhD, Associate Professor, Kazan Federal University, Kazan

TURKEY

Osman Cerezci, Professor Dr., Dept. Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Sakarya University, Adapazarı Suleyman Dasdag, PhD, Prof. Dr., Biophysics Department, Medical School, Istanbul Medeniyet University,

Uskudar, Istanbul
Onur Elmas, MD, PhD, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. Of Physiology, Mugla Sitki Kocman

University, Mugla
Ayse Inhan Garip, Assoc. Prof., School of Medicine, Biophysics Dept., Marmara Univ., Istanbul
Suleyman Kaplan, PhD, Professor, President of Turkish Society for Stereology, Board member of Journal

Chemical Neuroanatomy (Elsevier), Board member of Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure

(Elsevier), Department of Histology and Embryology, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun
Fulya Kunter, Assistant Professor Dr., Dept. Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul Selim Şeker, Professor Dr., Department of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Bogazici University
Nesrin Seyhan, Prof. Dr., Gazi University Medical Faculty, Founder Head, Biophysics Department;

Founding Director, Gazi Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Centre (GNRK), Ankara

UKRAINE

Olexandr Tsybulin, PhD, Department of Biophysics, Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University Igor Yakymenko, Prof. Dr, Department of Biochemistry and Environmental Control

Scientist Appeal for 5G Moratorium 9

National University of Food Technologies, Kyiv

USA

David O. Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment, A Collaborating Centre of the World Health Organization, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY

Barry Castleman, ScD, Environmental Consultant, Garrett Park, MD
Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, Visiting Prof. Medicine, Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical Center & Ondokuz

Mayis University, Medical School (Turkey); Pres., Environmental Health Trust, Teton Village, WY Paul Doyon, MA, MAT, EMRS, Independent Researcher, Doyon Independent Research, CA
Beatrice A. Golomb, MD, PhD, Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
Peter F. Infante, DrPH, Managing Member, Peter F. Infante Consulting, LLC, VA

Toril H. Jelter, MD, MDI Wellness Center, CA
Elizabeth Kelley, MA, Electromagnetic Safety Alliance, Tucson, AZ
Henry Lai, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
B. Blake Levitt, medical/science journalist, former New York Times contributor, EMF researcher
Trevor G Marshall, ME, PhD, Director, Autoimmunity Research Foundation, CA
Ronald Melnick, PhD, Senior Toxicologist, (Retired RF-section leader) US National Toxicology Program, Na-

tional Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
L. Lloyd Morgan, Senior Research Fellow, Environmental Health Trust, Board Member, In- ternational EMF Alliance (IEMFA), CA
S. M. J. Mortazavi, PhD, Professor of Medical Physics, Visiting Scientist, Fox Chase Cancer

Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, Director, Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, Uni-

versity of California, Berkeley, CA
Martin Pall, BA, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Biochemistry and basic medicine), Pullman, WA
Jerry L. Phillips, PhD, Exec. Director, Excel Centers, Professor Attendant, Department of Chemistry & Bio-

Camilla R. G. Rees, MBA, Health Researcher, Author ,”The Wireless Elephant in the Room”’ CEO, Wide An-

gle Health, Sr. Policy Advisor, National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy, NY Cindy Sage, MA, Sage Associates, Co-Editor, BioInitiative Reports, Santa Barbara, CA
Eugene Sobel, PhD, Professor (Retired), University of Southern California School of Medicine, CA John G. West, MD, Director of Surgery, Breastlink, CA

## 5G in 2 minutes

Cancers, DNA and Heart damage, found in rats exposed to cellphone radiation for 2 years.

BBC Panorama – WiFi Warning Signal.

Doctors call for delaying deployment of 5G due to health risks.

There are ZERO studies showing safety of 5G: Senate Hearing – 7th Feb 2019.

Senator Patrick Colbeck Testifies Against 5G.

Dr Sharon Goldberg Testifies on 5G Safety.

Dr Angie Colbeck Testifies on 5G Safety.

Dr Devra Davis – The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation.

David Drew MP – 5G – Westminster Hall Tuesday 25 June 2019

Robert F. Kennedy Jr on 5G.

How 5G violates the Nuremberg Code.

Doctors say LED streetlights could be impacting your health.

Barrie Trower (Royal Navy Microwave Weapons Expert) On Microwave Radiation.

Active Denial System (ADS). Microwave weaponry.

5G Technology: The Greatest Conspiracy of All Time?

What’s inside the new LED street lights?

5G – THE EXTINCTION EVENT

An Invisible Threat. (Wireless and Mobile Radiation).

This Video Might Change Your Opinion On 5G.

How we can beat 5G.

Wireless wake-up call | Jeromy Johnson.

from Get 5G AWARE

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

eNodeB – WHAT ARE THEY?

eNodeB – BC LOCATIONS

eNodeB – Alberta

eNodeB – Ontario

eNodeB – Quebec

eNodeB – USA LOCATIONS

eNodeB – Sweden

eNodeB – RF Measurements

eNodeB – 5G Health Effects

eNodeB – 5G MEDIA COVERAGE   /   5G VIDEOS  /   BC Government & Telus

eNodeB – Petition

0