By Angela Jung South Okanagan reporter Global News
February 12, 2015 5:11 pm Updated: February 12, 2015 6:17 pm
VIDEO : OSOYOOS — Armed with a pen and paper, Martin Saad is determined to fill a petition opposing a cell tower proposal. He lives just across the street from where Rogers Communications plans on erecting the 115-foot cell tower. Rogers says the proposed tower, which will be on a vineyard property near Highway 97 and 92 Avenue, will improve cell phone coverage in the Osoyoos area.
The telecommunications giant has been running ads in a local paper and sent out information packages to nearby residents. Yet Saad isn’t among those who have been contacted by Rogers.
“I’m surprised that I didn’t get this package that allows you to critique and give input,” he says.
Andrew Garas, a Rogers Consumer Communications Specialist, says the company follows Industry Canada’s regulations of notifying properties located within three times the height of the proposed tower.
According to its calculations, just five homes meet that criteria. And that’s not sitting well with other residents.
“You would think for something of that magnitude, everyone would be informed,” says Ryan Street, another nearby resident.
Saad says the proposed tower will be a major eyesore. In addition to that, he’s worried about the health implications of living near a cell tower.
“The jury is out right now on what cell phone towers can do to you, so why take the chance?”
But the telecommunications company says its towers follow standards set out by Health Canada.
Osoyoos Regional District Director Mark Pendergraft says if there’s enough interest, there may be an open house in the future for people to voice their concerns.
Rogers is doing a consultation of its own.
People have until February 23 to email their comments to [email protected] with reference site: W3601 – Osoyoos.
http://globalnews.ca/news/1828093/osoyoos-residents-oppose-cell-tower-proposal/
#1 by Norm Ryder on February 13, 2015 - 12:30 pm
I have electromagnetic hypersensitivity. in the last few years because of the increase number of radiation sources my life has become increasingly isolated and uncomfortable. there are many areas near where I live I do my best to avoid and spend a limited time in them if I have to go near them. Few people realise that the radiation from a source does not start reducing at that well known invers3e square law until a considerable distance from the source. in the case of a cell tower this can be as much as 250 meters.
Recently while discussing rooftop radiation issues with a worksafe BC inspector his advise was to read the RF toolkit for Environmental Health Practitioners done by the BC Center for Disease control – a far from complete discussion on the subject but a good primer on the topic . It is available form their web site
#2 by Robert Riedlinger on February 18, 2015 - 10:23 am
I was driven from my home in Harrison Hot Springs,back in 1996 because a tower situated near my home made me ILL and left me with electro magnetic hyper sensitivity.Our Government cares more about comunications than public health.It is time for change!!
Jimmy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIlOVJd0lA8
Dr Dart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpQegD1D34k
Cancer Calling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poecdIs0xxw
Barry Trower
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VH-tTV33WE
Extreme Health Radio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u0zOb5TKVw
Do Cell Phones Cause Breast Cancer?
http://e-h-s.wikidot.com/illnesses:breast-cancer